Abra, the Bible does NOT state "Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live."
Well, I beg to differ with you on that one. The King James Bible that I'm using has the following verbatim words.
Exodus 22:18 "Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live."
Straight from the Bible verbatim.
In Old Testament Hebrew, depending on dialect, the word that is translated as "witch" has one of three meanings. Poisoner, assassin, or farmer. The closest translation would be poisoner. This was corrupted during translation, in that the word for herbalist or apothecary is very similar to the word for poisoner, because they, in Hebrew, share the same root. In England, during the translation into English, most herbalists were older women with a large store of folk knowledge, and most were viewed as being witches.
I'll be the first to agree that interpretations and translations of the Bible are quite ambiguous and the term 'witch' means different things to different people depending on their own interpretations, etc.
But let's face it, most people are going to automatically assume that the term 'witch' refers to anyone who practices 'witchcraft'. And witchcraft is often seen as any rituals that call upon the forces of nature or spirit for the purpose of transformation or manifestation. In other words, anyone who practices magick with a 'k' is a witch then.
Note: The 'k' differentiates spiritual magick from illusion, or stage magic, which is spelled without the 'k'.
In any case, the Bible does specifically states in verbatim words, "Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live." so most people are going to assume that anyone who practices witchcraft is a witch.
So, is it obvious yet that I was "this close" to being a minister? :)
I too almost become a Christian minister. Most people who read my posts probably think I'm Satan himself.
But actually I was very much a worshiper of Jesus. I was born and raised into a Christian family and many of my uncles where preachers. They would often have religious discussions after dinner, or sitting around a campfire where they would disagree with each other on central issues. And these were all Free Methodists, so we're even talking about a single Christian denomination here.
Well, it immediately came to my attention that even educated clergy who have made preaching the gospel their life's career can't seem to agree on what the Bible says. Actually that didn't even stop me in and of itself. I figured there had to be an single absolute correct answer. I was indeed an 'absolutist' in those days. I believed in absolute truths and that once the absolute truth was discovered it was absolutely correct.
Therefore, if the Bible is truly divine and genuinely the words of the supreme creator of this universe then there should be no ambiguity at all. Perhaps it's in the CONTEXT of the stories I thought. So I decided to study it myself and find these absolute answers.
What I discovered is that the bible is truly vague, inconsistent, and outright self-contradicting. I finally came to the conclusion that it is truly a worthless book. Particularly the Old Testament.
I agree that the things that Jesus taught were cool. At least the moral principles that he is attributed to teaching. In fact, they are the very same moral principles that were taught by Buddha centuries earlier. Jesus added nothing new! A lot of Christians like to claim that only Jesus brought these concepts to man, but that's is an utter falsehood. Jesus taught precisely the very same things that Buddha taught centuries before he was ever born. Jesus add nothing new.
Of course, then we come to the demagoguery part where the Christians claim that Jesus was the sacrificial lamb of God and that everyone must believe in him and accept him as their 'savior'. But even according to the Bible Jesus was never attributed to saying any of those things. That kind of demagoguery was clearly added by the authors who were claiming what Jesus said. It's obvious to me that this is precisely what happened.
Ironically, it was actually my desire to preach the gospel that lead me to the profound conclusion that it can't possibly be true. I am totally convinced beyond any shadow of a doubt that Jesus was not the son of the God of Abraham, and that he in fact denounced the teachings of the Old Testament. Even the Bible is 100% in agreement with that. This is precisely where I got the information!
The demagoguery that Jesus was born of a virgin, died as a sacrificial lamb of God to pay for the sins of humanity, and then rose from the dead to show off his magick, is precisely that - demagoguery added by a culture that was trying to restore their original religion by propping it up with Jesus.
So my intense interest in the doctrine only proved to me that Jesus could not possible have been the son of the God of Abraham.
I might add also, that Isaac Newton also came to this very same conclusion! Which I was completely unaware of at the time. I wish they taught those FACTS in High School!
That's what we should be teaching our children - the TRUTH!
So anyway, yes, the Bible does say, "Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live". And the Bible is indeed extremely ambiguous. So much so that I'm in total shock at how many people continue to support and preach this totally ambiguous doctrine.