I have seen Elvis in movies, and in televised concerts. Seems like his dance repertoire was pretty much one move,hip and leg gyrations (unless you count some of the stiff stuff that was choreographed into the movies). MJ was actually the innovator of so many dance moves and inspiration for many dancers which I doubt Elvis was.
Elvis was primarily a great singer/musician. I liked his songs, I just didnt see a diversity of talent in him as I did MJ. Not to say that he wasnt somebody with the booze, just speculating on how much MORE he could have been without it.
Elvis had moves too.
plus he did movies.
What elvis would have been? LOL. Elvis is already somebody even with the drug/booze and early death.
You must know nothing of Elvis.
well michael could sing, dance, write, produce, but I think the only instrument he played was his voice
Elvis could sing and write and he played the guitar
I think MJ had MORE talents and a longer career in which to hone them,as well as more of a love for what he did. Who knows what Elvis might have been if he had started younger and had a harder work ethic(instead of the drugs and booze).
