It's just another way to take power away from the people, like the way our constitutional rights have been under attack.
Tom Cruise reportedly built an underground shelter and was ridiculed for it. Who's laughing now, hey?
smart of him, if i had the money i would definitely do the same. $h!t is gettin crazy.
I have "stashes" because other than taking cover from any initial "event" (natural disaster not necessarily included) I would rather be mobile than pinned down. Then too, I don't have a family unit to consider. There are advantages to both, but someone will always seek to obtain what they don't have, and shelters do mean supplies, therefore, targets.
In chaos it is also hard to know who you can trust. Just look at the riots over simple shite that really effects nobody but the families of the victims. Fear triggers actions in people that many wouldn't consider under normal circumstances
If you were ever in a war zone you would understand my point.
Rules, laws, morals and ethics take a back seat to survival. Riots are child's play in a true catastrophe of life and death. The "greater good" becomes survival of the fittest
A real enemy doesn't have to defeat our armies, just take down our power grid and we will do ourselves in!
They want to take away our guns, but what will you do when there is no electricity, no phone, no gasoline, no stores, no 911..... throw a law book at them? Will police be protecting you or worrying for their own family's safety?
How many could face an armed attacker with only a knife or club and hope to survive?
Just points to consider whether there is a chance of it happening or not. A wise person always plans for the unexpected
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on Tue 04/28/15 10:41 AM