What does the new curriculum look like?

It will teach students in Grade 1 the proper names for body parts. Grade 2 students will learn about the broad concept of consent by being told that no means no. Concepts of gender identity will be introduced in Grade 3, though the curriculum doesn't get explicit and positions sexual orientation as one of the potential qualities that distinguish people from one another.

Discussions about puberty move to Grade 4 from Grade 5, while education about intercourse will take place the following year. Masturbation and "gender expression" will be taught in Grade 6, while kids in Grades 7 and 8 will discuss contraception, **** and oral sex, preventing pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections.

Students will also learn about online bullying and the dangers of sharing sexually explicit images electronically.

This whole idea, of adults discussing sexuality
with children, reeks like the gateway to pedophilia.

The act of physical touching, is referred to as
overt molestation.

The act of discussing sex and/or sexuality,
is referred to as covert molestation.


If you'll look at the names of the proponents of
this b.s. plan, many of them are the same chomos
who want the age of consent lowered to 13 or younger.

John1111 stated >>>
Just yesterday I saw a news report in Ontario regarding a province wide new sex-ed curriculum coming into effect in Sept for the first time. No mention of the "XE" gender fluidity BUT

grade 7 students do NOT need to learn about **** & Oral sex IMO

It is NOT mandatory, which is a good thing for concerned parents.

What does the new curriculum look like?

It will teach students in Grade 1 the proper names for body parts. Grade 2 students will learn about the broad concept of consent by being told that no means no. Concepts of gender identity will be introduced in Grade 3, though the curriculum doesn't get explicit and positions sexual orientation as one of the potential qualities that distinguish people from one another.

Discussions about puberty move to Grade 4 from Grade 5, while education about intercourse will take place the following year. Masturbation and "gender expression" will be taught in Grade 6, while kids in Grades 7 and 8 will discuss contraception, **** and oral sex, preventing pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections.

Students will also learn about online bullying and the dangers of sharing sexually explicit images electronically.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ontario-sex-ed-curriculum-5-things-to-know-1.3059951

There once was a time, fellow member John; when I thought that 5th grade on up had 'NO NEED' to know about STD's or oral sex dangers...but then I became aware that our youth of America were being Brain Washed into thinking that 'ORAL SEX' was "SAFE SEX" and it was being done in this age group!
My son graduated in 1994 - just in his class alone there were 3 girls that had been diagnosed with oral STD's from 'doing that SAFE SEX ACT' like their boy friends had told them!

Identifying body parts by their REAL NAME: unfortunately for the smallest child that is suffering sexual abuse within a home - from a family member/step parent/sibling/or neighbor...knowing what their specific body part is called will aide & assist in getting legal help far sooner then the ole days where puppets and a story boards were the method to pull the information out of the poor molested child. Facts & details matter.

This is not the same way that it was when I was growing up; kids today know far more about a lot of dangerous things that can provide a lifetime of physical/medical harm to them if they aren't forewarned and are just left to 'HEAR' it from some other 'FRIEND WITH AN AGENDA'...the word on the street = getting your bell rung with a gullible truth!

That is so true. Just recently Canada is TRYING to pass a law that school administration, teachers can NOT strip search children,(claiming drugs or anything else) only police can.

Sex ed should focus more on relationships research shows
'Young people aren't that obsessed with sex, what they're obsessed with is romance'

This is interesting,




http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/sex-ed-should-focus-more-on-relationships-research-shows-1.3076556

oh lord,, what is quantitative enough about 'romance' to have education devoted to it?


I thought it was about teaching them whats important to know to protect them, not feeding subjective ideals to entertain them,,,


there is the need for them to know the anatomy, there is a need for them to know about how it works, what it can lead to, and how babies are made


all this other alternative crap being forced in is just scary and unnecessary, not to mention infringing upon the parents boundaries more and more,,


we are really losing it,,,,

I couldn't agree more. Parents are & should always be ' THE Authority '...
Their children
Their family values
Their religion
Their culture.

This is do dangerous.

oh lord,, what is quantitative enough about 'romance' to have education devoted to it?

Nothing dangerous about it, it's called education. Parental Dark age mentality has no place in todays society as that would leave their child vulnerable... is what they are trying to avoid.





Uhhhh romance encompasses everything leading up to sexual contact?
damn straight it's quantitative enough, at least as a single chapter? Maybe the communities who have an over abundance of dead beat dads can reverse this trend by teaching right from wrong from the start... or

we can stick with what doesn't work

romance is not quantitative at all,,,,some people feel romance with text messages, some feel romanced with hugs and kisses, some with flowers, its a totally SUBJECTIVE And nonqualitative concept that plays NO PART in prepareing kids to be successful in life by teachins dome conformist agenda about what 'romance ' is,,,

The "Romance" teachings could include all those facets you just brought up, anyways, I'm no expert, and by the looks of things, neither are you. See being successful in life starts with this, unless you equate success in life to financials. That would be quite sad.

You can discount it all you like, those are the choices parents make. It's an uncomfortable situation, to explain or teach sexuality, and some parents avoid it altogether. The streets are a terrible place to learn this.

As for the deadbeat dad reference, it had more to do with what's right and wrong when any romantic relationship has ended. How many instances are there of a man/woman turning their back on his/her children because of the crazy antics of their exs?

I'm backing out of this thread now, I think i spoke my mind enough about this subject

The "Romance" teachings could include all those facets you just brought up, anyways, I'm no expert, and by the looks of things, neither are you. See being successful in life starts with this, unless you equate success in life to financials. That would be quite sad.

You can discount it all you like, those are the choices parents make. It's an uncomfortable situation, to explain or teach sexuality, and some parents avoid it altogether. The streets are a terrible place to learn this.

As for the deadbeat dad reference, it had more to do with what's right and wrong when any romantic relationship has ended. How many instances are there of a man/woman turning their back on his/her children because of the crazy antics of their exs?

I'm backing out of this thread now, I think i spoke my mind enough about this subject

And what a very good mind it is!

I enjoyed the article you posted John...With respect to those parents opposed to sex education, I liked O'Sullivan's description of them as the "vocal minority"...I hope she is right...

As technology continues to evolve at break neck speed, the need to inform and protect children becomes even more crucial...Sex and relationship education is about 'learning' the emotional, social AND physical aspects of human sexuality and sexual health...With so much negative influence coming from "outside" the home, children need quality sex and relationship education now more than ever!...In spite of the fact that statistics on teen pregnancies have declined to their lowest point since tracking began, those and teen STD stats in the U.S. tell a grim story...Todays teens have already been exposed to more sexually explicit games, movies, magazines and videos then we adults see in a lifetime!...Every time I go out, I see tween and teen age "girls" sporting makeup, dyed hair and provocative clothing...Our kids are bombarded with sex, yet only 22 states and the District of Columbia require their public schools to teach Sex Ed...It should also be noted that 37 states and the DOC require school districts to allow parental involvement, 3 states require parental consent, and 35 states and the DOC allow parents to opt-out on behalf of their children...

The human sex drive is as powerful as it is normal...It's impossible to stop the inevitable so why not do everything in our power to ensure safe sex?...I say replace sexual repression and puritanical thinking with critical thinking, which is another "subject" that I think should be mandatory....

BRAVO...Leigh; well stated...and if nothing else proves your POV to be SPOT ON then the % of pre-teen/high school pregnancy in those southern states that refuse to allow any sex end classes to be taught in their schools!

ABSTINENCE JUST DOESN'T WORK AGAINST RAGING HORMONES.

I disagree that being successful startts with 'romance'

and I completely disagree with letting bureacrats decide to define what 'romance' is for my kids


I agree with teaching 'responsibility' . which is completely different than teaching about 'romance'


however, I think that teaching should come from examples around children and not conformed to some public agemda