Is the Right To Life and the Right to defend it obsolete?
There is no "Right to Life" in the Constitution.
It doesn't have to be. The Declaration of Independence outlined it as an "inalienable right". Meaning; regardless of what any other document says, citizens should know they have a right to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness". No government can tell us otherwise.
It also states that if the government becomes "destructive to these ends" it is the "right" and responsibility to alter and/or abolish said government. This is where the second amendment comes in. If the meaning were only that people working for the government could have arms, then how could the people be guaranteed the ability to "alter" or "abolish" said government?
The Declaration is a mindset, a statement made that encourages people to keep their independence, rather than hand the power to make ALL decisions to a select body of people. If the constitution is the brain, the Declaration of Independence is the heart. One cannot survive without the other.
I believe it was Jefferson who said; "If men cannot be trusted to govern themselves, then how can they be trusted to govern others? Or has god granted us angels in the form of kings to watch over us? Let history answer this question."
Among several reasons, the Declaration was never made into a legally binding document in the United States, precisely because it DOES talk about an inalienable right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. At least half of the United States which came into being over a decade after the Declaration was signed and published, were extremely opposed to those concepts.
None of the people who that document talked about, were citizens of the United States.
The Declaration does NOT overrule any other document. It doesn't have any legal force whatsoever in the United States. Because at the time it was written and signed, the United States didn't exist.
My only point continues to be, that the second Amendment is open to interpretation. It has BEEN reinterpreted many times, including by the Supreme Court.
It could do with a bit of a rewrite, for the sake of clarification, however I wouldn't trust anyone in office today to take on that job.