argo stated >>>
depends on your point of view....i suppose, the NATIVE American Indian feels the same about the white people who invaded and stole their lands from them by force...
alleoops replied >>>
Who gave it to them?
Argo stated >>>
nobody gave it to them, it belongs to them....look up the word indigenous...
mightymoe posted >>>
they didn't just magically appear here, they came from somewhere else as well... mongolia, from the land bridge during the last ice age... last i heard, ALL humans came from central Africa, meaning everyone moved about at one time or another...
alleoops replied >>>
Yes, just means they were there at some point. Indians were migratory
tribes and had no permanent location.
mightymoses posted >>>
and all the whiny libtards can't see facts... the winners of wars write the history, not the losers...
argo stated >>>
even conceding (which i don't) that human life originated in cen. africa tens of thousands of years ago and there was movement from there outward, has little to do with where the different races settled and became indigenous to their various areas of earth...i don't remember any history lessons about the native american indian getting in their canoes and paddling across the ocean to invade those lands indigenous to the caucasian peoples...the real facts are the exact opposite...it was the whiteman who migrated to the americas to take for themselves whatever he wanted without regard to the people and culture that had been established here for thousands of years prior to him setting foot on this continent....due to superior weaponry, first the flintlock and cannon then later in the deployment westward, the repeating rifle, gatling gun and six-shooter pistol, the Native American, with bow & arrow, spear and tomahawk stood little chance to defend his homeland from the paleface invaders from across the seas.....you're absolutely right about the winners of war writing history, but it's also true that no matter how much lipstick you put on an ugly pig, it remains an ugly pig...
it is the height of hypocrisy for white anglo saxons to whine about immigration practices in a country where all 100% your ancestors were immigrants who conquered this land through war against those who are native...
TY, Argo...the consistent diatribe about 'WHINY LIPTARDS' grows so old and redundant; we all could just start saying ---
Oh, look here comes another '___________' consistent post!
Discovery of oldest northern North American human remains provides new insights into Ice-Age culture
Date: February 24, 2011
Source: American Association for the Advancement of Science
Scientists have discovered the cremated skeleton of a Paleoindian child in the remains of an 11,500-year-old house in central Alaska. The findings reveal a slice of domestic life that has been missing from the record of the region's early people, who were among the first to colonize the Americas.
******edited for space >>>
Although many of the specifics are still under debate, researchers generally believe that the first people in North America came across the Bering Land Bridge from Siberia some time near the end of the last ice age, around 13,000 years ago or earlier. Archaeological evidence from this time period is scanty, however, especially in the northern regions adjacent to the Bering Sea, known as Beringia.
Scientists have discovered only a handful of known houses in North America from the continent's first 2,000 years of human occupation. And, except for the one at Upper Sun River, those houses are in the lower 48 states or at Ushki Lake in Siberia. Ushki Lake also includes the only known burial site from this time period in Beringia.
The stone tools from contemporaneous sites in central Alaska fit into a category known as microblade technology, which consists of small, stone, razor-blade-like pieces set into larger organic points. In contrast, the more well-known Clovis people of central North America did not make microblades. In fact, the stone artifacts, along with the house structure and the types of animal remains found at Upper Sun River appear more similar to those of Siberia's Ushki Lake than to anything from the lower 48 states.
Perhaps now with more 'Global Warming' and the warmest 2 winters in Alaska --- more areas will be thawed and exposed for further research! Maybe?
Edited by
2OLD2MESSAROUND
on Wed 07/01/15 05:35 PM