Ms Harmony, I may have given the benefit of the doubt if there had been one or two accusers but when we are dealing with over 2 dozen accusers and counting, the proof is in the pudding (pop).
nah, cant trust drug users,,,its a sad fact
they are known to lie and being that most all are known to have used/abused,, there still is no 'proof' they were taken advantage of,, vs willingly trading sex for drugs,,,
Hmmmm... I may have to reconsider this now... NOT.
1st they are all lying gold diggers,, now they are all drug abusers. willing to trade their bodies for sex....unbelievable... Lol
This is what agenda's do to people.
its no agenda, its life
I have experience around drug users, I remember the culture decades ago, I know how drugs are/were 'recreational' in many circles
and I know that those who use drugs to escape or be entertained will also lie to cover up or shift blame
being after money is one reason people lie,, yes,,, especially if they go to civil lawsuits for an alleged 'crime' and not to criminal courts
and
drug users are very capable of exaggerating the truth and flat out lying
and
people are often one way in the moment and than another way after 'thinking' about it when things dont turn the way they expected,,,
so, yes,, I can believe it was easy for those in the drug using group to all piggy back each other in some alternate version of what happened
giving drugs for sex, as a victim of sexual assault myself, ,is not even in the same BALLPARK as what I consider to be rape
anymore than giving money for sex,, although one could argue the payor is 'taking advantage' of how desperate the payee is
