How does one identify "the 'public' community"?
Aren't all members of a community a part of "the 'public' community"?

The Europeans didn't throw stones at the Muslims [in Europe]. I was quite young for most of my time in Europe I don't recall any laws against having parades or public gatherings where one could or would be seen by someone who would be offended. I'm quite certain both of my parents told me throwing rocks at people or property was against the law.

I consider freedoms of speech and peaceful assembly to be good things.

The problem is they believe muslims will cave like christians did. All the crap they pulled like interrupting mass and services with their protests and generally just name shaming christianity.

This is kind of like a hockey goon from the minor leagues that beat every one up moving to the NHL and starting a fight with Bob Probert... You find out quickly that you ain't in the minors any more and when they are hauling you off the ice on a stretcher it is a little late to reconsider your actions.

semantics,, communities are collectively part of the public

but the 'public; in atlanta is a bit different then the 'public' in boston


so, when one is out in a certain COMMUNITY in public,,,knowing that culture does not agree with certain behaviors,, just to flaunt that behavior,,,,,,

So, what if the homosexual culture approves of the behavior?
Or does only one particular culture have a say?

Ask the europeans that drew cartoons of mohammed how that worked out.. The ones that aren't dead.. If you can find them..

If Muslims in Sweden can't tolerate freedoms of speech and peaceful assembly, then perhaps they should move to Saudi Arabia.

go to san francisco, or other 'gay' communities,,,

the culture of the COMMUNITY should dictate the behavior,,,

I wouldnt go to an amish town and wear daisy dukes and a tee shirt,, its an inconsiderate type of tacky bullying

this is what I wanna do and you have no choice but to tolerate me,,,,,,,

its not about tolerateing freedom of speech


one has no 'choice'


its about speaking or behaving offensively BECAUSE you know others have no choice but to tolerate it

its just my opinion that its tacky,,,and bullyish

I wouldn't be too concerned. The photo is probably not an actual Muslim and possibly not even a gay man. The photo isn't part of the 'article' if you can even call something from Blazing cat fur an article.

In which Executive Orders are used change policies against the will of the people or Congress?

BTW, Benjamin Franklin and the Founding Fathers wore wigs, heels and hose.
and powdered their faces.

Just curious, do your police carry weapons?

Executive Orders (EOs) are legally binding orders given by the President, acting as the head of the Executive Branch, to Federal Administrative Agencies. Executive Orders are generally used to direct federal agencies and officials in their execution of congressionally established laws or policies. However, in many instances they have been used to guide agencies in directions contrary to congressional intent.

Not all EOs are created equal. Proclamations, for example, are a special type of Executive Order that are generally ceremonial or symbolic, such as when the President declares National Take Your Child To Work Day. Another subset of Executive Orders are those concerned with national security or defense issues. These have generally been known as National Security Directives.

The President's source of authority to issue Executive Orders can be found in the Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution which grants to the President the "executive Power." Section 3 of Article II further directs the President to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed." To implement or execute the laws of the land, Presidents give direction and guidance to Executive Branch agencies and departments, often in the form of Executive Orders.


thisnation.com

So, if Congress represents what the culture wants, and if the POTUS issues an EO that contradicts Congress, then the POTUS is engaged in bullying, right?

I would call it pushing the limits of of constitutional power.

If gays in sweden can't tolerate religious beliefs then they should move to San Francisco.

I don't usually disagree with you but on this I have to say that I do. If they have no 'choice' which they certainly do, they shouldn't be in our schools and colleges or live outside of Muslim countries where drugs and alcohol use is discussed joked about displayed and several businesses profit from sales regardless of the religion of their customers. No one is going ahead of the parade handcuffing them to chairs and taping their eyes open.

How are gays in Sweden interfering with anyone's practice of religion?

no, president has authority

just like parents have authority

or a boss has authority


citizens dont have authority over other citizens,, unless they are politicians, parents, or bosses,,lol