Ok I just watched new footage released (snippets) from other officers on the scene and heard tensings attorney Stewart Matthews express his version of what happened. In the footage released today it has tensing trying to establish a reason for shooting.
"I was being dragged. I was afraid he was going to run me over."
We heard this on the original video from tensings body cam. Now we have him saying the same thing from another nearby body cam. We also have more footage of tensing getting up off the ground after firing the shot.
Matthews states that he believes tensing began to be dragged, fired the shot and fell to the ground. Footage from the officer on the opposite side of the car doesn't show the conversation the shooting or any dragging, it only briefly shows tensing sitting on the ground and getting up to persue. Due to several obvious edits I previously thought tensings hand to be on the door handle as he was opening the door. As Anderson Cooper interviewed Matthews a replay of the seconds before and after the shot was fired he asked if the shot was fired prior to or after the car moved. In repeat with this detail in mind, tensings hand is NOT on the door handle. Dubose' hands are in view near the key, not the shifter. Tensings right draws the pistol and the left hand goes untouched into the window around the area of Dubose' chest.
Sunny Hostin CNN Legal Analyst, argues that the car didn't move until the shot was fired and if the car moved first than her eyes were lying to her. The ears of witnesses will validate the doubt one may have as you clearly cannot hear the car accelerating until AFTER the shot has been fired.
Add to this that at the time f the very quickly fired shot, the left hand of tensing which is the only part of his body ABLE to be dragged by, is in open space in the middle of where the window would be. This is NOT the action of an officer who lacks training or is afraid of the very polite driver. If Dubose wanted to drag tensing or had any idea that tensing intended on drawing his weapon he would have grabbed tensing or at least moved his hands towards his face or even straight up to surrender.
It is highly likely that Dubose saw the video of the Sandra Bland arrest and the coverage that followed it. The voice and body language of Dubose was nothing remotely close to the verbal belligerence of Bland.
This man had 10 children. Ten. He didn't have a front license plate, The two university police SUVs were behind his car. He may not have had his drivers license on him but anyone could see that he was not making quick jerky movements towards a place where he might have a gun or knife and he was very polite. Even if he wasn't sober as some have claimed with NO PROOF he did what he had been taught was the right thing to do. Keeping his hands in plain sight, moving slowly, being polite, and staying INSIDE the car until ordered otherwise. He was NEVER ordered to "step out of the vehicle and put your hands on the roof".
Tensing yelled loudly and quickly, STOP, STOP! Dubose had NO ACTION to stop. The shot was fired, then the car moved. I believe that video experts and frame by frame analysis along with audio analysis forensics and even psychological analysis will convince a jury to find the officers guilty.
Edited by
germanchoclate1981
on Thu 07/30/15 10:08 PM