There are some in our society that deserve special treatment. Police and firefighters come to mind as public servants who risk their lives without great financial reward.
IMHO, Starbucks should officially tell their stores that the policy for restroom use 'quietly' does not apply to uniformed police, firefighters, military, or similar citizens who have the duty to protect us all.
The policy of "no public use" of restrooms is to keep street bums away from the stores. This past weekend I was at a Starbucks where a bum came into the store and screamed obscenities at the worker who had asked him to leave earlier. It was a really ugly scene. Two cops came in a few minutes later and were outside talking to the bum when I left.
If you see no need to give special consideration to a cop. He/she may not feel like giving you the special consideration of risking their life to save your azz. Most do anyway.
My point is, if they do it for one cop, they need to do it for all, and everyone who saves lives, so doctors, nurses, firefighters, paramedics, army, life guards. The list goes on............
And then arguments will start, because these people are getting special treatment because of the job they chose and the general public could make a issue of it.
Even though their job may not involve saving lives, it could still be of great importance to the public. Its not just people on the front line who play a part in saving lives, so where do you draw the line?
I just don't see the fuss, when there was another toilet just down the road. If there Wasn't, like I already said my opinion would be totally different.
I know if this happened to me when I was in uniform, I wouldn't have posted it on face book. Its just petty on both parts.
Edited by
debbie1980
on Thu 09/17/15 06:24 AM