Mingle2 apple store icon
Try Mingle2 app for better experience
Community Recent My Topics
Community > Politics, Current News & Events
Topic: Kim Davis Loses In Court Again
Reply
germanchoclate1981's photo

germanchoclate1981

Wed 09/30/15 12:05 PM


When asked under "whos authority" does she deny the issuance of marriage licenses, her reply was "Gods authority"

Last I heard, God did NOT vote her into this position so she doesn't have a leg to stand on IMO.

Civil disobedience comes to mind, we as a society cannot tolerate such unilateral decision making on any public level. it's absurd and illegal and that's enough for me.
Enough with the whackjobs trying to scuttle the laws of the land.

Separating Religion from State affairs is a must, remove her at once!

Here here!
germanchoclate1981's photo

germanchoclate1981

Wed 09/30/15 12:23 PM





When asked under "whos authority" does she deny the issuance of marriage licenses, her reply was "Gods authority"

Last I heard, God did NOT vote her into this position so she doesn't have a leg to stand on IMO.

Civil disobedience comes to mind, we as a society cannot tolerate such unilateral decision making on any public level. it's absurd and illegal and that's enough for me.
Enough with the whackjobs trying to scuttle the laws of the land.

Separating Religion from State affairs is a must, remove her at once!


its not unilateral, its individual,, and it should be one of the possibilities we revere about being 'american'


I believe individualism is alive and well in America, what you're promoting here is that the "individual" in a position of power should be encouraged to infringe and abuse on the rights of others based on their personal beliefs, that makes no sense at all in a structured society, promoting this only shows how divided things have become, we're willing(you) to sacrifice what is right with what we believe to be right as individuals. The revered possibilities you speak of (in this clerks case) are contrary to the normal functioning of society. Mrs Davis is out of line.

If she's good at her job, there should be no problem finding other employment, instead of doing the right things and resigning, she chooses to dig in her heals and sow division in a very Non Christian way.

and you're propping her up?


yes, I am


since when is losing ones livelihood 'right'? if we take the LGBT agenda out of it


lets say, Im a christian, and my job starts requiring its employees to wear pants, and due to my religion, I am not able to wear pants,,,,,,,,is it the 'christian' thing to just therefore quit?

or is it just as 'christian' to allude to the supposed right to my religious expression by seeking an exception ?


what is the purpose of 'religious exemption', which is a real and LEGAL thing,, if its not aceptable as an alternative to being unemployed,,,?




Then the FDA and the USDA should jail ALL hog farmers, shut down EVERY establishment that processed butchered stocked sold cooked or served pork? The pig is a filthy animal. The bible does say that we shouldn't eat it. So no one anywhere in America should be subject to bacon or pork chops or ham.
no photo

RebelArcher

Wed 09/30/15 12:31 PM



Many of her constituent's and or hillbilly
cousins are just as dumb or disillusioned as she
is.
That a huge assumption on your part...speaking of dumb. They have every right to their beliefs as you do...whether you agree with them or not.
She doesn't represent you, she represents the voters who voted for her....and if she runs again, it'll be interesting to see if she's elected again.

I didn't assume the constitutions 1st and 14th amendments, the oath she swore to, the supreme court legal review, or. who the supreme court justices were. It doesn't matter if her or her constituents get dumber or more disillusioned between now and the next election. If she doesn't meet her obligation and continues to openly defy the Courts orders she'll be in jail or prison where she belongs for subversion treason and malfeasance of office.
No you just attacked people you dont know one damn thing about based on the state they live in...pure frickin genius.
Btw...that supreme court decision was made on a vote of 5-4...and there is alot of talk that the SC enacted policy instead of interpreting the Constitution....either way, some should just quit acting like it was a damn 9-0 decision.
I, personally think she should just follow the law...but her constituents elected her BEFORE gay marriage was legalized and I can see her point.
But those who vehemently oppose ANY opposition to gay marriage jump on this one woman and want her crucified....so damn intolerant by a group that frickin preaches tolerance till the cows come home....thats some frickin irony right there.
Btw....the ORIGINAL point of my first post still stands..I DO wonder what her constituents think...but all you wanna talk about are hillbilly cousins or some $hit....very telling.
Edited by RebelArcher on Wed 09/30/15 12:36 PM
no photo

SassyEuro2

Wed 09/30/15 01:13 PM




Many of her constituent's and or hillbilly
cousins are just as dumb or disillusioned as she
is.
That a huge assumption on your part...speaking of dumb. They have every right to their beliefs as you do...whether you agree with them or not.
She doesn't represent you, she represents the voters who voted for her....and if she runs again, it'll be interesting to see if she's elected again.

I didn't assume the constitutions 1st and 14th amendments, the oath she swore to, the supreme court legal review, or. who the supreme court justices were. It doesn't matter if her or her constituents get dumber or more disillusioned between now and the next election. If she doesn't meet her obligation and continues to openly defy the Courts orders she'll be in jail or prison where she belongs for subversion treason and malfeasance of office.
No you just attacked people you dont know one damn thing about based on the state they live in...pure frickin genius.
Btw...that supreme court decision was made on a vote of 5-4...and there is alot of talk that the SC enacted policy instead of interpreting the Constitution....either way, some should just quit acting like it was a damn 9-0 decision.
I, personally think she should just follow the law...but her constituents elected her BEFORE gay marriage was legalized and I can see her point.
But those who vehemently oppose ANY opposition to gay marriage jump on this one woman and want her crucified....so damn intolerant by a group that frickin preaches tolerance till the cows come home....thats some frickin irony right there.
Btw....the ORIGINAL point of my first post still stands..I DO wonder what her constituents think...but all you wanna talk about are hillbilly cousins or some $hit....very telling.


:thumbsup: Brilliant