“You’re carrying a gun to class? Yeah well
I’m carrying a HUGE DlLDO. Just about as
effective at protecting us from sociopathic
shooters, but much safer for recreational
play,” the organizer, Jessica Jin, wrote.

yep,any wouldbe-Shooter on seeing one of
those Things,will lay down his Firearm and
immediately surrender!
http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=zVmF03a0TiA

"" Students at the University Of Texas at Austin
are planning to protest a new law that
permits the concealed carry of handguns on
campus — with dlldos .

The “campus carry” law passed by the Texas
legislature and signed by the Governor in
June, requires UT Austin and the other
campuses in the UT system to allow
students to carry guns on campus . It gives
the schools some discretion on how to
implement the law.
The protest is designed to draw attention to
the fact that carrying a ***** to class could
be “prohibited expression” under university
rules. The rules prohibit “any writing or visual
image, or engage in any public performance,
that is obscene .”
“You’re carrying a gun to class? Yeah well
I’m carrying a HUGE DlLDO. Just about as
effective at protecting us from sociopathic
shooters, but much safer for recreational
play,” the organizer, Jessica Jin, wrote.""
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2015/10/11/3711527/cocks-not-glocks-university-of-texas-students-plan-provocative-protest-of-new-campus-carry-law/





Can some of you Texan Minglers explain Austin to me? They seem so Un-Texan


Edit- I just had to check that bastion of SJW-ness known as Twitter after initially seeing this story, and, of course, there is already a hashtag floating around....

#cocksnotglocks

...those SJWs are a creative bunch

Can some of you Texan Minglers explain Austin to me? They seem so Un-Texan.

But of course. Austin is the anus of Texico. Being a sanctuary city for re-tards. All types of fecal matter is drawn to it.

"" Students at the University Of Texas at Austin
are planning to protest a new law that
permits the concealed carry of handguns on
campus — with dlldos .

The “campus carry” law passed by the Texas
legislature and signed by the Governor in
June, requires UT Austin and the other
campuses in the UT system to allow
students to carry guns on campus . It gives
the schools some discretion on how to
implement the law.
The protest is designed to draw attention to
the fact that carrying a ***** to class could
be “prohibited expression” under university
rules. The rules prohibit “any writing or visual
image, or engage in any public performance,
that is obscene .”
“You’re carrying a gun to class? Yeah well
I’m carrying a HUGE DlLDO. Just about as
effective at protecting us from sociopathic
shooters, but much safer for recreational
play,” the organizer, Jessica Jin, wrote.""
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2015/10/11/3711527/cocks-not-glocks-university-of-texas-students-plan-provocative-protest-of-new-campus-carry-law/





Can some of you Texan Minglers explain Austin to me? They seem so Un-Texan


Edit- I just had to check that bastion of SJW-ness known as Twitter after initially seeing this story, and, of course, there is already a hashtag floating around....

#cocksnotglocks

...those SJWs are a creative bunch

Just curious if this is gonna be one of the faves waved around...

Can some of you Texan Minglers explain Austin to me? They seem so Un-Texan.

But of course. Austin is the anus of Texico. Being a sanctuary city for re-tards. All types of fecal matter is drawn to it.

��You’re carrying a gun to class? Yeah well
I’m carrying a HUGE DlLDO. Just about as
effective at protecting us from sociopathic
shooters

Cmon... group hug yaselves after that "Austin"
circle jerk session

"" Students at the University Of Texas at Austin
are planning to protest a new law that
permits the concealed carry of handguns on
campus — with dlldos .

The “campus carry” law passed by the Texas
legislature and signed by the Governor in
June, requires UT Austin and the other
campuses in the UT system to allow
students to carry guns on campus . It gives
the schools some discretion on how to
implement the law.
The protest is designed to draw attention to
the fact that carrying a ***** to class could
be “prohibited expression” under university
rules. The rules prohibit “any writing or visual
image, or engage in any public performance,
that is obscene .”
“You’re carrying a gun to class? Yeah well
I’m carrying a HUGE DlLDO. Just about as
effective at protecting us from sociopathic
shooters, but much safer for recreational
play,” the organizer, Jessica Jin, wrote.""
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2015/10/11/3711527/cocks-not-glocks-university-of-texas-students-plan-provocative-protest-of-new-campus-carry-law/





Can some of you Texan Minglers explain Austin to me? They seem so Un-Texan


Edit- I just had to check that bastion of SJW-ness known as Twitter after initially seeing this story, and, of course, there is already a hashtag floating around....

#cocksnotglocks

...those SJWs are a creative bunch

Australia's National Firearms Agreement would
face strong opposition in the US and possibly
even be considered unconstitutional.

Some learn quicker than others I guess

http://www.businessinsider.com/australias-ex-pm-changed-gun-laws-2015-10?ref=yfp

Australia's former prime minister explains how he helped solve mass shootings in his country

On April 29, 1996, 35 people were killed and 23 wounded when a 28-year-old Australian man opened fire in Port Arthur, Australia.

Twelve days later, the Australian government, under then-Prime Minister John Howard, proposed a sweeping set of gun laws known as the National Firearms Agreement.

It banned numerous types of semi-automatic rifles and shotguns, created a national firearms registration system, and permits for each gun purchase required a 28-day waiting period.

It was by no means an easy reform to pass, as Howard explained in a New York Times op-ed in 2013 — one month after the Sandy Hook shootings.

"After this wanton slaughter," Howard wrote, "I knew that I had to use the authority of my office to curb the possession and use of the type of weapons that killed 35 innocent people. I also knew it wouldn't be easy."

At the time, the Australian national government could only control gun import, but couldn't restrict gun sales or ownership. In order to pass the plan, Howard had to convince the country's states to each pass the gun control laws themselves.

In order to convince all the states to participate in supporting legislation, Howard threatened to hold a nationwide referendum to alter the Australian Constitution to grant the national government gun-control powers. Because a majority of the public was in favor of gun control, such a referendum would have passed, according to Howard.

The threat was never realized.

"In the end, we won the battle to change gun laws because there was majority support across Australia for banning certain weapons," Howard wrote.


As part of the agreement, the government introduced a one-time tax to finance a large-scale compulsory buyback program that took in 700,000 guns.

The legislation seems to have been a resounding success. Firearm homicides and suicides dropped—though the effect on suicides was more statistically significant than that on homicies—and gun massacres disappeared.

Australia has a radically different gun culture from the US. Though rural areas of Australia have a strong gun culture like the US, gun ownership is not considered a fundamental right. Close to 60% of Australians live in cities, where gun ownership is not as prevalent.

Australia's National Firearms Agreement would face strong opposition in the US and possibly even be considered unconstitutional.