as far as I can tell
pro life means the main concern is the life of the human inside the woman
and pro choice means the main concern is the life of the woman carrying the human,,,,
This is about as concise of and explanation as I think you will see.
It does leave out the concept that prochoice ALSO addresses the quality of life of the fetus will most likely have.
Many people who support pro-choice have a deep regard for fetal life and future babies/human beings.
If they feel the birth will result in untold misery and likely death after catastrophic efforts to save an infant that will have almost zero chance at quality of life, possible ruining the future hopes at the parents having a subsequent healthy child by allowing a late term miscarriage, maybe impoverishing the entire family (including siblings) with a life long dependent child they opt for the difficult choice to terminate a fetal life before it matures enough to feel pain.
Many of the people who support prochoice love children deeply and have spent a life time dedicated to children and not just the selfish self interest of adults.
They have very intimate knowledge of exactly how much suffering is in store for unwanted babies and how only a minuscule number of babies with disabilities ever go home to real families. And how many of those families survive in tact even if they do. The system that exists for unwanted children is so overwhelmed that if the children were animals the SPCA would be clamoring for it to be shut down. Pets are actually treated better than children. At least we have shelters for pets.
Sometimes prochoice is for the good of all at the expense of one. Granted that is a helpless fetus that the potential can not be known for certain but to you torture a child on the premise of potential? That is also part of what prochoice is about.
Since I have rarely if EVER seen a ProLifer do ANYTHING to help the truly desperately needy families care for a special needs baby/child, care about the safety of the human being carrying the child, the safety and welfare of those who actually support mother's who's choice is not to have an abortion but need the desperately in short supply medical care that IS given I have a serious distrust of their motives.
And I have a serious problem with their tactics which are often to harass, intimidate, assault, and even kill those who dare to question if their facts are "truthful" or it they are manipulating the truth about "procedures", motives, and outcomes. If you have to lie, cheat, break the law to make your case then how can a legit debate be held.
Edited by
PacificStar48
on Tue 12/29/15 11:53 AM