And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
This passage indicates that the Bible is NOT subject to interpretation. That it is written as intended.
Then it threatens you.
That means everyone that substitues their own meaning to the passages are in violation.
If it talks about dragons, it means dragons.
If it talks about a multiheaded beast, it means a multiheaded beast.
If it talks about a lamb, it means a lamb.
http://biblehub.com/revelation/22-19.htm
New Heart English Bible
for plain english
If anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his part from the tree of life, and out of the holy city, which are written in this book.
that is interesting
of course 'prophecy' implies predictions, and 'this book' was the book of Revelations, not all the books of the Bible
take away, can be interpreted as any type of change or translation, or merely omitting some part.
I can say Hello, in English and translate it to Hola in Spanish, but I have not taken anything away (the same thing is being said)
I don't think 'take away' has anything to do with something being literal or not, but only regarding omitting what is there (whether what is there is literal or figurative or metaphorical)
I understand what you are saying but...
So many times it has been argued that the Bible is the word of God. To interpret what is written to mean different things is substituting the word as written to mean what you think it means.
However, the words are written specifically. Transcribed thru the ages by people's understanding of what was originally written.
The original specific meaning of each word is changed by transcription so it makes sense to the readers of that particular language. Lost in translation is a very real condition of transcription.
Upon the very first transcription of the Bible the monks doing the transcription used their own understanding of the words they were transcribing. Repeat this process a thousandfold over the centuries and the meaning of the original script gets befuddled.
if any man shall take away from the words of the book
Implies that the only one that can give meaning to the words is God and since these are the words of God, the meaning is written as intended.
So if God says there is a mark on the forehead, there is actually a mark on the forehead. He didn't imply it, He wrote it as He intended.
If the Bible IS the Word of God and He instructed a man to write His Word, It is written exactly as He intended it.
This means that Creation did happen exactly as written.
That dragons do exist, because that is what He wrote.
If, however, The Bible is not the Word of God, then it is a work of Man. With all the flexibility religions give to the passages, this has more reasonable credence.
It is a work of fiction used to manipulate the morals and actions of other men. That is not such a bad thing in and of itself considering the times in history when it was written. Men needed guidance from On-High and the Bible gives them that.
It established the moral code we have even today. Its a brilliant tactic and very effective.
It gives punishments and rewards that are not had in the reality of life experiences. You pay for your sins after you die unless you believe what is written and follow those rules.
People don't kill because of reality repercussions of law but they also won't kill because they fear the repercussions detailed in the Bible. A very effective deterrent that exists beyond perceived reality.
Revelations prophesizes the finality of Man's struggle with morality. It offers a reward for some and a punishment for others.
What it doesn't offer is a time frame. So, any society thru time anticipates it as an imminent future that they might witness first hand. It keeps us locked in eternal anticipation.
As much as I can see the effectiveness of it all, I also see a shift in the societal intelligence as we learn more and a population. More and more of the lessons are making less and less sense to a people that have experience based reasoning ability.
More people exist in the "I believe what I see" than the "I believe what he said" mentality. Reality has become our teacher.
Unlike some, I have no real problem with anyone believing what they choose. Where I have a problem is when those same people will not afford me the same consideration. Then they try to use pre-established beliefs as reasoning to change my view. However, that reasoning has obvious faults to what reality teaches.
If you find contentment in your religion and it gives you peace, by all mean, go ahead. Just don't try to tell me I'm wrong in my beliefs.