That's not what it says.



At best the OK court said "we're not going to legislate from the bench."


Good. That's the way it's supposed to work.

Prosecutor/Lawyer: Interested in being a HOT-Shot (self-interest)

* "prosecutors were clearly in the wrong to charge the young man with forcible sodomy, and not a lesser crime of unwanted touching."

That's what I read, and its the right decision. The people who don't like the result need to get out there and lobby for better laws.

These days "advocating for personal responsibility" is somehow "victim blaming".

I've heard stories from guys who said they were intimate with women they met at the bar - they said those women were fully awake and explicitly consented to everything. But the next day the women says she remembered none of it, and certainly didn't remember giving consent.

I don't even know how the law treats this in this day and age. Maybe one day it'll be illegal to have sex unless you've previously signed a written agreement, or check each others breathalizers to confirm you are capable of giving consent.

Only the Internet marriage web will work will it? Even it is totally 100% free. Then what's behide? Damn.....some time I'm feel like some drunky moely hail to the USA......