Mingle2 apple store icon
Try Mingle2 app for better experience
Community Recent My Topics
Community > Politics, Current News & Events
Topic: Connecticut passes "gun confiscation" bill
Reply
Smartazzjohn's photo

Smartazzjohn

Thu 05/05/16 08:31 AM


Violence isn't always unjustified.
Whether the weapon is a gun, a knife or a baseball bat there is a potential that it can be used for personal protection, criminal aggression or even recreational purposes.



Well people in general shouldn't be threatening their spouses or anyone else for that matter.

A threat IS violence, therefore those who threaten should lose his/her rights.


If a threat isn't carried out the threat is JUST WORDS. You think a threat itself.....AKA WORDS....is violence and is a reason for a person to lose their rights??????
Is that why so many REGRESSIVE liberals try to shut down speech they don't like...even if it requires inciting riots to stop that speech?


Edited by Smartazzjohn on Thu 05/05/16 08:38 AM
Conrad_73's photo

Conrad_73

Thu 05/05/16 08:34 AM


funny,this thread is about whether that Law is unconstitutional or not!That's all there is to it,the Canadian Snow-job notwithstanding!
Will be a Cold Day in Hell when other Countries can decide that the 2nd is null and void!
ErotiDoug's photo

ErotiDoug

Thu 05/05/16 08:36 AM



Violence isn't always unjustified.
Whether the weapon is a gun, a knife or a baseball bat there is a potential that it can be used for personal protection, criminal aggression or even recreational purposes.



Well people in general shouldn't be threatening their spouses or anyone else for that matter.

A threat IS violence, therefore those who threaten should lose his/her rights.


people sure are scared of something they know nothing aboot...the Open carry law here in Texas, and you know what? NOTHING HAS CHANGED... people aren't killing each other, very rarely even see a gun strapped on, and it's just not a big deal...

it's people like you who keep schreeching about their fear of guns that paint this "violent" escapades that don't always happen...


they don't want us to judge muslims based on a few radicals, but yet the want to paint every gun owner as a violent radical...

liberal logic, eh?


*** I LOVE The Calgary Stampede :banana: (in Alberta) Yaa-Hoo
* The gunslingers are SOOoooo fast, cool-fun!!
*** Cody Stampede is great as well!! (
* (wasted youth) rofl rofl rofl
no photo

JOHNN111

Thu 05/05/16 08:40 AM



Violence isn't always unjustified.
Whether the weapon is a gun, a knife or a baseball bat there is a potential that it can be used for personal protection, criminal aggression or even recreational purposes.



Well people in general shouldn't be threatening their spouses or anyone else for that matter.

A threat IS violence, therefore those who threaten should lose his/her rights.


people sure are scared of something they know nothing aboot...the Open carry law here in Texas, and you know what? NOTHING HAS CHANGED... people aren't killing each other, very rarely even see a gun strapped on, and it's just not a big deal...

it's people like you who keep schreeching about their fear of guns that paint this "violent" escapades that don't always happen...


they don't want us to judge muslims based on a few radicals, but yet the want to paint every gun owner as a violent radical...

liberal logic, eh?


You should try and focus here instead of shooting ya mouth off like a canon Billy Bob.

This is what the subject is about

The goal is to protect women from the increased lethality at a critical point in a relationship: when they are trying to leave their abusers. About 14 domestic homicides occur annually in Connecticut, half of which are caused by guns.


whoa


mightymoe's photo

mightymoe

Thu 05/05/16 08:44 AM




Violence isn't always unjustified.
Whether the weapon is a gun, a knife or a baseball bat there is a potential that it can be used for personal protection, criminal aggression or even recreational purposes.



Well people in general shouldn't be threatening their spouses or anyone else for that matter.

A threat IS violence, therefore those who threaten should lose his/her rights.


people sure are scared of something they know nothing aboot...the Open carry law here in Texas, and you know what? NOTHING HAS CHANGED... people aren't killing each other, very rarely even see a gun strapped on, and it's just not a big deal...

it's people like you who keep schreeching about their fear of guns that paint this "violent" escapades that don't always happen...


they don't want us to judge muslims based on a few radicals, but yet the want to paint every gun owner as a violent radical...

liberal logic, eh?


You should try and focus here instead of shooting ya mouth off like a canon Billy Bob.

This is what the subject is about

The goal is to protect women from the increased lethality at a critical point in a relationship: when they are trying to leave their abusers. About 14 domestic homicides occur annually in Connecticut, half of which are caused by guns.


whoa





so you're the only one who gets to "shoot their mouth off" ?


i know you like to believe everything your socialist government tells you, but i already know that's NOT what it's aboot... it's aboot gun control, plain and simple... and you shooting your mouth aboot something that has nothing to do with your socialist country doesn't help anything...
no photo

JOHNN111

Thu 05/05/16 08:46 AM





Violence isn't always unjustified.
Whether the weapon is a gun, a knife or a baseball bat there is a potential that it can be used for personal protection, criminal aggression or even recreational purposes.



Well people in general shouldn't be threatening their spouses or anyone else for that matter.

A threat IS violence, therefore those who threaten should lose his/her rights.


people sure are scared of something they know nothing aboot...the Open carry law here in Texas, and you know what? NOTHING HAS CHANGED... people aren't killing each other, very rarely even see a gun strapped on, and it's just not a big deal...

it's people like you who keep schreeching about their fear of guns that paint this "violent" escapades that don't always happen...


they don't want us to judge muslims based on a few radicals, but yet the want to paint every gun owner as a violent radical...

liberal logic, eh?


You should try and focus here instead of shooting ya mouth off like a canon Billy Bob.

This is what the subject is about

The goal is to protect women from the increased lethality at a critical point in a relationship: when they are trying to leave their abusers. About 14 domestic homicides occur annually in Connecticut, half of which are caused by guns.


whoa





so you're the only one who gets to "shoot their mouth off" ?


i know you like to believe everything your socialist government tells you, but i already know that's NOT what it's aboot... it's aboot gun control, plain and simple... and you shooting your mouth aboot something that has nothing to do with your socialist country doesn't help anything...


Well your paranoia is getting the best of you.

and for your information, many Americans agree with me on this subject... If the info makes sense, does it really matter where it comes from? I don't think so.

Go bully somewhere else.
mightymoe's photo

mightymoe

Thu 05/05/16 08:53 AM






Violence isn't always unjustified.
Whether the weapon is a gun, a knife or a baseball bat there is a potential that it can be used for personal protection, criminal aggression or even recreational purposes.



Well people in general shouldn't be threatening their spouses or anyone else for that matter.

A threat IS violence, therefore those who threaten should lose his/her rights.


people sure are scared of something they know nothing aboot...the Open carry law here in Texas, and you know what? NOTHING HAS CHANGED... people aren't killing each other, very rarely even see a gun strapped on, and it's just not a big deal...

it's people like you who keep schreeching about their fear of guns that paint this "violent" escapades that don't always happen...


they don't want us to judge muslims based on a few radicals, but yet the want to paint every gun owner as a violent radical...

liberal logic, eh?


You should try and focus here instead of shooting ya mouth off like a canon Billy Bob.

This is what the subject is about

The goal is to protect women from the increased lethality at a critical point in a relationship: when they are trying to leave their abusers. About 14 domestic homicides occur annually in Connecticut, half of which are caused by guns.


whoa





so you're the only one who gets to "shoot their mouth off" ?


i know you like to believe everything your socialist government tells you, but i already know that's NOT what it's aboot... it's aboot gun control, plain and simple... and you shooting your mouth aboot something that has nothing to do with your socialist country doesn't help anything...


Well your paranoia is getting the best of you.

and for your information, many Americans agree with me on this subject... If the info makes sense, does it really matter where it comes from? I don't think so.

Go bully somewhere else.


go spread your socialist propaganda somewhere else...
no photo

JOHNN111

Thu 05/05/16 09:24 AM



Violence isn't always unjustified.
Whether the weapon is a gun, a knife or a baseball bat there is a potential that it can be used for personal protection, criminal aggression or even recreational purposes.



Well people in general shouldn't be threatening their spouses or anyone else for that matter.

A threat IS violence, therefore those who threaten should lose his/her rights.


If a threat isn't carried out the threat is JUST WORDS. You think a threat itself.....AKA WORDS....is violence and is a reason for a person to lose their rights??????
Is that why so many REGRESSIVE liberals try to shut down speech they don't like...even if it requires inciting riots to stop that speech?





The "LAW" disagrees with you and so do I.

A threat IS violence! waving
Conrad_73's photo

Conrad_73

Thu 05/05/16 09:29 AM




Violence isn't always unjustified.
Whether the weapon is a gun, a knife or a baseball bat there is a potential that it can be used for personal protection, criminal aggression or even recreational purposes.



Well people in general shouldn't be threatening their spouses or anyone else for that matter.

A threat IS violence, therefore those who threaten should lose his/her rights.


If a threat isn't carried out the threat is JUST WORDS. You think a threat itself.....AKA WORDS....is violence and is a reason for a person to lose their rights??????
Is that why so many REGRESSIVE liberals try to shut down speech they don't like...even if it requires inciting riots to stop that speech?





The "LAW" disagrees with you and so do I.

A threat IS violence!

BullPOOP!
no photo

massagetrade

Thu 05/05/16 06:11 PM



Violence isn't always unjustified.
Whether the weapon is a gun, a knife or a baseball bat there is a potential that it can be used for personal protection, criminal aggression or even recreational purposes.



Well people in general shouldn't be threatening their spouses or anyone else for that matter.

A threat IS violence, therefore those who threaten should lose his/her rights.


If a threat isn't carried out the threat is JUST WORDS. You think a threat itself.....AKA WORDS....is violence and is a reason for a person to lose their rights??????
Is that why so many REGRESSIVE liberals try to shut down speech they don't like...even if it requires inciting riots to stop that speech?





But... a threat IS violence!


WAR IS PEACE, FREEDOM IS SLAVERY, and IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH!


slaphead
mightymoe's photo

mightymoe

Fri 05/06/16 09:25 AM

more liberal logic...