He claims to have “a great relationship with the blacks,” which is totally something a normal person would say.
A "normal" person would not run for president.
And just yesterday, referred to Elizabeth Warren as "Pocahontas", referring to her supposedly Native American ties.
Seems it's alluding to something more like Hillary's "sniper fire."
Pointing out a delusion.
Elizabeth Warren is promoting her native american heritage.
There is no evidence she is native american, didn't grow up on a reservation, genealogists that tried couldn't prove it, but the story sure helped her take advantage of diversity affirmative action policy.
If "sniper" was a race he'd probably call Hillary Carlos Hathcock.
If Warren was touting British heritage he'd probably call her king Richard.
If Bill Clinton started calling himself black I think Trump would be calling him Tupac.
IMO it's not racist so much as making fun of their bs.
No different than your best friend trying to rap and you say "give it a rest Vanilla Ice."
Kinda childish, but not racist in the sense it's being taken as.
Yeah. Classy guy
That's kind of what people want to avoid, isn't it?
Continuing the class stratification where only the elite get elected to "leadership" positions?
Trump is promoting the facade that he's like the average guy, only rich, because he worked so hard at success, but he's just like everyone else.
Most people aren't "classy."
did you know he's still not disavowed the KKK for their support of him?
Did you know the KKK hasn't officially said anything about supporting Trump?
Only a former leader? On his radio show? Like Sean Hannity?
No KKK fundraisers, no KKK dinners, no hiring old KKK leaders to work on his campaign, no lavish $300KKK a plate parties.
One guy with a radio show told listeners one night that voting against trump is treason to their heritage or something.
Then media said "Do you unequivocally renounce David Duke and support from the KKK!?!"
And Trump was all "I don't know what you're talking about. Who is David Duke? I'm not renouncing a guy I don't know, nor know what he said."
Possibly as a means to stoke the idea that he doesn't just knee jerk react to sensationalism or something like he's been accused of.
If he knee jerked reacted to denounce the support, that would also have unequivocally "proven" to many people that there actually was some kind of support, some relationship to denounce, where there might not be one.
That should have been done the very second he heard about it
So he should knee jerk react to sensationalist media personalities goading him to react, thereby lending credibility to false assertions?
he needs all the voters he can get in November. Even the horrendously evil ones
I don't think he has most of the support of Wall Street or prisons.
I think those go to Hillary and Bernie.
Oh wait, you meant different horrendously evil ones.