the real estate mogul had "touched a part of our electorate that doesn't like...
OMG!
OMG!
OMG!
Potential scandal!
...where our country is."
Awwwwwww....
"I have no problem supporting Mr. Trump," she told the AP.
What's with all the innuendo from this woman?
,,,yeah,, REAL Divisive universal healthcare
Very divisive when "universal healthcare" is translated to mean "universal mandatory insurance, or else pay a tax penalty. You have to a. pay more for insurance, b. pay more in taxes for the insurance healthcare law to subsidize the market and companies until they know how high their premiums have to go next year and they'll always increase, and c. pay more for healthcare. But we promise it won't raise taxes, you can keep your doctor, healthcare will be cheaper, and it's not a tax."
equal pay for women
Very divisive when it keeps being shown that the inequality doesn't really exist and the tiny amount that does exist can't be proven that it's due to anything other than personal choice by women.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/christina-hoff-sommers/wage-gap_b_2073804.html
lgbt rights
Tend to be divisive when people keep thinking it means they have to lose something to the gain of someone else, when nothing is really being lost or changed at all, and the government doesn't help the issue at all by not explaining things on a 4th grade level instead choosing to be threatening.
she is gonna fight for the economy
Can't fight for the economy.
At best you can fight for the government defining to you and forcing on you what the economy is.
Otherwise, markets and economies simply adapt to anything the government throws at it, always working around the rules in sometimes painful ways, to what works for people. No drugs? Black market smuggling. EPA? Pay off local politicians and dump anyway. Universal healthcare? Sorry, not accepting anymore medicaid patients, got cash? come on in. Don't take cash, how 'bout bitcoin or gold. Let's start a farm coop, you produce meat, I produce vegetables, they produce fruit, we barter among us screw the FDA and thanks for the farm subsidies.
she is gonna fight for...the rights of all americans
Can't fight for the rights of all Americans.
That would require all Americans to agree explicitly what all rights are.
You can fight for purity of interpretation of the constitution and the enumerated rights therein. And you can fight to express your own as you define them.
There's a huge difference.
e.g.
regardless of religion
Some religions feel they have the right to human sacrifice, or polygamy, or not having to pay taxes, or living outside the laws of the nation that their god's laws are higher and the only ones that matter.
She still fighting "for the rights of all Americans?"
gender
I'm 28 but believe my gender is of an 8 year old pansexual boy, and my religion says I have the right to marry at 6, and I like 12 year olds.
She still fighting "for the rights of all Americans?"
race
I'm an 80 year old white guy that self identifies as a full blooded Choctaw Indian, so I am entitled to certain things from the government and reservation.
She still fighting "for the rights of all Americans?"
especially for the children and educational system
Children don't have the same rights as other people.
She fighting for the rights of children to own a gun?
How about for them to pay taxes?
Vote at birth?
How about forbidding their mom to search their room or enter without a warrant? Or being able to answer "I plead the fifth" without any consequences when asked if he slapped his sister? Or a trial by peers when the kids mom grounds him for being out past bedtime?
Or the right to report her for kidnapping when she grounds him to his room?
Rights of "all Americans."
And eh. Education system is failing on all levels. Fight the losing battle all she wants.
its just one of many efforts to represent all groups of americans
Impossible to represent all groups of Americans anymore.
Americans working too hard to individually identify as a group in themselves.
I'm a gender neutral demisexual therian wolf artist poet that's 1/8 african american, 1/4 irish, 1/10 slovakian, 1/6 native american, 1/1000000 arabian, half latte, conservatively progressive libertarian while liberally centrist college student, pan-buddhist neochristian islamic fundamental spiritualist...if you must categorize me with "labels." Call me Ze. Persyn if an honorific is necessary to conform to your perceptions.
No point in representative government if an individual will only allow themselves to represent themselves.
Centralized government can't afford to overly specialize.
Nor can it please everyone all the time.
Someone has to lose something.
Settling for nothing less than win win means almost everyone loses.
....I think I might have gone off topic.
