inconsistencies,,, do muslims yell 'god is great'? or 'allah'
does a citizen who pledges allegiance to a terrorist ideal or group automatically commit terrorism or is it expected that a terrorist act involves someone more than allegiant but actually a member of?
did the Swedish boy with a Nazi manifesto who killed those kids a while back get charged with 'terrorism'? ( I honestly do not remember)
is a crime against a group for their lifestyle an act of terrorism or a hate crime? can it be both, or do we have to choose one?
does it matter if one kills gay people because they were brought up christan to belive it wrong or because they were brought up believing someone or something else in believing it was wrong?
what now? do we use a mass shooting to unite in fear/hatred of muslims,, or in fear/hatred of guns?
I do believe a larger percent of mass shootings involve guns than muslims though,,,
And what about the Muslims chopping off peoples heads..in the name of their God... does that fall under " well, boys will be boys" in your world.
no more than Christians beating or cheating on their wives,,,
it falls under 'humans will by hypcorites/sinner,,, you name it'
and every religion has humans at its core,, good ones, bad ones, sane ones, and insane ones
How can You justify "Christians beating or cheating on their wives..."
WITH
Muslims chopping off peoples heads in the mame of their religion?
O.o
Seriously disjointed thinking...
no, not at all
if the argument is peoples individual actions are the fault of their religion
its right on point
extremists are called extremists because they aren't the norm
they are individuals who act outside of the norm for some political or social gains
You mean like a POTUS or nominee blaming guns for the actions of people?
Or American citizens for the actions of terrorists?
Obama: ‘We’ are to blame, not Islamic terrorism, for massacre
http://nypost.com/2016/06/12/obama-says-we-are-to-blame-not-islamic-terrorism-for-orlando-massacre/
people, humans, kill humans
'we' are humans,, 'we' are to blame as humans for disregarding human life
and people with guns commit mass shootings, so caution where guns are concerned is also logical and rational
No, it's not. Before 1990, mass shootings were a rare thing. Several changes took place in that year that have enabled massacres to occur:
The creation of gun free zones
The restriction upon the right of self defense
The adoption of the policy of widespread use of psychotropic medicines designed for adults to be used on children
These three main events have contrihuted more to mass shootings than anytime before 1990.
Semi-automatic firearms have been with the population for nearly 90 years at that point. And, with the exception of adult criminal use for personal gain, rarely used to kill more than one person.
well,, correlations abound'''
I do find logic in the correlation between mental illness, in the Reagan era many facilities for those individuals were closed and outpatient drug care took over
and most all the assailants have a history of mental illness'
there is no correlation in my mind to gun free zones, as there is no evidence most are aware of care where they are
and many plan to die anyway,, so they wouldn't care,,,death by a cops gun or citizens,, no difference
we did peak in the 90s and have been coming down since though the death toll in each incident is certainly increased with weapons that can fire so many rounds per second,,,
