Carter wasn't presidential material, he was an astrophysicist, he made more contributions to the space program than any other president...

but obarry, hands down, is the worst president i've seen in my lifetime...

oh, and BTW, hi beautiful, how you been? Wb!

Jimmy Carter, had a PhD. in nuclear physics.
Yet, couldn't pronounce the word "nuclear".

"nu-cu-ler"

no Astrophysicist there!
Also no Nuclear Physicist as he bragged during his Campaigning!

actually he had no such thing,maybe the reason he couldn't pronounce it!

http://atomicinsights.com/picking-on-the-jimmy-carter-myth/

Once again, I will share with you a letter that I wrote to the author of an article in the mainstream press. It is unlikely that this one would ever be printed, most of the time space limitations for letters to the editor force readers into a 200 word box.

Dear Mr. Fialka:
I enjoyed your story about new efforts to recycle nuclear fuel. It is definitely the right thing to do; our current once-through cycle only extracts about 3-5% of the potential energy of the initial fuel loads.

One myth correction, however. President Carter was a submarine officer, but he was not a nuclear engineer.

He graduated from the US Naval Academy in June 1946 (he entered in 1943 with the class of 1947, but his class was in a war-driven accelerated 3 year program) with an undesignated bachelor of science degree. Even if the Naval Academy had offered a majors program for his class, it is unlikely that it would have included Nuclear Engineering as a option – after all, the Manhattan Project was a dark secret for most of his time at Annapolis.

After graduation, Jimmy Carter served as a surface warfare officer for a two years and then volunteered for the submarine force. He served in a variety of billets, including engineer officer of diesel submarines and qualified to command submarines.

In November 1952, he began a three month temporary duty assignment at the Naval Reactor branch. He started nuclear power school (a six month course of study that leads to operator training) in March, 1953. In July 1953, his father passed away and he resigned his commission to run the family peanut farm. He was discharged from active duty on 9 October, 1953. According to an old friend of mine who served as Rickover’s personnel officer at Naval Reactors, LT Carter did not complete nuclear power school because of the need to take care of business at home.

The prototype for the USS Nautilus was completed in Idaho in May 1953, so LT Carter might have had some opportunity to see it in action before leaving the Navy. However, the USS Nautilus did not go to sea until January 17, 1955, so there is no possibility that he ever qualified to stand watch on a nuclear powered submarine.

He never experienced the incredible gift of being able to operate a power plant that was so clean that it could run inside a sealed submarine, so reliable that it could power that submarine even deep under the Arctic ice, and so energy dense that the submarine could operate for years without new fuel.

When I think about the 1976 campaign and the importance of the energy issue at that time, I cannot help but wonder why Jimmy Carter’s promoters made such a big deal about his nuclear expertise. My wonder turns to cynicism when I think about the policies that his administration imposed and the damage that they did to the growth of the industry just at a time when we most needed a vibrant new energy industry player.

Best regards,

Rod Adams
Editor, Atomic Insights
www.atomicinsights.com

It is sometimes important to try to set the record straight.

neither could bush...

The Obama Contamination

<copied in part>

All this is simple childishness, the journalistic equivalent of sticking your fingers in your ears and whistling Dixie so you don't have to hear the bad news. Whether you agree with Obama or not, the fact remains that his administration has been wracked with scandal from the IRS to Fast and Furious to the persecution of journalists to Benghazi to the lies about Bowe Bergdahl to the lies and dirty deals used to pass Obamacare to the lies used to push the Iran nuclear deal and on and on. Just because the New York Times has responded to these scandals with a curious lack of interest in no way means they didn't exist.

As for Obama's success, a fair journalist might at least consider his disastrous mishandling of the Middle East, the economic crumbling of Obamacare, the out-of-control debt, a recovery that never quite takes off because of feverish over-regulation and (did I mention?) Obamacare, and of course the upsurge in racial tension which the president has stoked with his reckless pre-judgements of the police and his false 1970s view of America.

The desperate need of left-wing journalists to see Obama as "pure" and "most successful" — to see him as they've reported him instead of how he is — is in part a result of the racial pathology of the left, its tendency to reduce people to their victim group. The notion that "the first black president" has been a failure would be, according to this way of thinking, a nasty slight against a race rather than, what it is, an indictment of bad ideas and their consequences.

<full article here>

http://pjmedia.com/andrewklavan/2016/07/10/the-obama-contamination/?singlepage=true

George bush was the worst.
Remember george bush knew about september 11 & was ok with killing his own people, bush being an arms dealer & sparked wars for oil & natural resources & other sinister shiit so in my opinion i wouldn't really say obama is the worst.
Hate for obama only comes from one thing, its not about what hes done or hasn't done but the main thing is because of his race.

I am pretty sure Jimmy Carter is happy about that.