I don't know.
I feel like the closer we get to November I'm trapped in a haunted house. I open one door, there's michael myers, so I run to the other door, and there's jason voorhees, I turn around, myers, turn around, jason.

There's no escape and the terror keeps closing in, with nowhere else to go.

Go there again?

There's no way not to go someplace horrible.


I don't think you did.
The OP is copied and pasted from other sites, and no source is given even though highlighting and searching any section comes up with lots of links.

And a lot of what is in the OP is not fact, convenient interpretation of events, and/or just plain manipulation turning irrelevant things into something nefarious.





I mean "Reno made the decision to gas David Koresh"
No, she didn't. The FBI came up with a plan, Janet Reno approved it.
As written it seems like Janet Reno made some kind of plan, and presented it to the FBI, as though the FBI are just sitting around waiting to be told what to do and how to do it. That's not how it works.

''Atty. Gen. Janet Reno on Tuesday vigorously defended her decision in 1993 to approve a tear-gas assault on the Branch Davidian compound near Waco, Tex.""
http://articles.latimes.com/1995-08-02/news/mn-30642_1_tear-gas-attack

Now please do the right thing and admit how wrong you were.
I'll admit, I won't be holding my breath.

so,since Reno signed off and approved the Plan,I'd think it would be her responsibility!
Hers and slick Willie's who went on National Television before the Raid and called Koresh insane!

There were numerous occasions where they could have arrested Koresh,without any harm to the rest of the Branch-Davidians,but I guess that didn't satisfy the FBI-,and DELTA-Force-Cowboys!

Some of that opening list is valid and correct, and some of it isn't. The parts that are accurate are enough to withhold praise and votes in favor of Clinton.

But I am all about accuracy, and factuality, so I do think it's important NOT to lie and exaggerate what each of the Clintons did and didn't do.

If nothing else, THE biggest reason why the Republicans are having trouble convincing the mass of the electorate not to choose Hillary, is because they DO spend to much time and effort lying and exaggerating.

If you want to defeat a politician, the LAST thing to do, is to lie about them. The reason why Clinton CAN get by with simply saying "Look! There they go again!" is because the Republicans keep indulging in this kind of mixing lies with facts.

So I suggest that everyone who does want to oppose Clinton, review this list, and take out the false parts, and the items where you are trying to blame Clinton for results which would clearly have happened no matter who was in charge.

Here's the repubs real problem.....

Amen!
The media use to talk about Trumps"free media" but now the mainstream media is actually working for the Clinton campaign.
Twisting everything Trump says and not covering all of Hillary's incompetency, frailty, corruption and criminal activities.

Protecting one of their own

What's funny....or rather, sad, is that some of the outlets are shameless in their bias.
Takes the whole fake "Trump said he wants 2a people to kill Hillary" narrative, for example.....

""(Reuters) - A federal official on Wednesday said the U.S. Secret Service had not formally spoken with Republican Donald Trump's presidential campaign regarding his suggestion a day earlier that gun rights activists could stop Democratic rival Hillary Clinton from curtailing their access to firearms.
Following Trump's comment at a rally on Tuesday in which he suggested that gun rights activists could stop Clinton from appointing liberal anti-gun justices to the U.S. Supreme Court, a federal official familiar with the matter told Reuters that there had been no formal conversations between the Secret Service and the Trump campaign.
Earlier CNN had reported that there had been multiple conversations between the campaign and the agency.""
http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN10L29W

They don't even attempt to hide it anymore....just lie and roll with it.

REUTERS has become absolute Leftard-Trash!
And the same goes Double for the Clinton News Network!

Provided you had an impartial MSM!

And according to the Clintonites,Hisslery is truthful and can do no wrong,and generally is as "Clean as fabric washed in Persil"!

it seems in politics neither side can claim clean hands, they both posture and pick and choose their facts to align with whether they support or oppose someone


the news needs sponsors, and an audience, and if the audience doesnt tune in they adapt programming to what their audience wants to tune in to


,the MEDIA is a reflection of the public and the public feeds off the media,, there is enough responsibility to go around

Isn't it a bit of a contradiction to complain about the lack of "an impartial MSM," when you can't bring yourself to spell a name correctly?

OMG!
Do you really want to go there and have THIS as your next First Lady?