Tom Steyer Wants To Nullify The Bill Of Rights To Get Other People’s Money Out Of Politics

Prop 59 would not just limit corporate political spending on elections, it would exempt wide swaths of American society from any constitutional protections whatsoever.

Tom Steyer wants to amend the U.S. Constitution to allow the government to regulate religious sermons, tap the phones of the American Civil Liberties Union, seize phone record and Internet search histories on a whim, and give bureaucrats veto power over the content of The New York Times.

http://thefederalist.com/2016/09/13/prop-59-tom-steyer-wants-nullify-bill-rights/

Leave it to someone in California, the home of the likes of Brown, Pigosi, Feinstein and all those other pillars of liberal idiocy!

The "I voted for it but I didn't vote for it!" crew.

time to truss up him,and that other filthy Swine George Soros,and deliver both of them by FEDEX,to Moscow,The Kremlin,care of Vlad Putin!
He would know what to do with the Filth!
After attaching all of their Assets,of course!

Then there is this as well.... as the senate moves to impeach the head of the IRS more and more information comes out of the FOIA requests it has taken almost 4 years for the "most transparent admin" to let go of....

Judicial Watch: Dem Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse Urged DOJ to Prosecute Tea Party Groups

A Democratic senator sought Justice Department and IRS Criminal prosecutions of conservatives in 2013, newly-released federal documents reveal.

The Department of Justice documents reveal email conversations between its officials and the staff of Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, a Rhode Island Democrat, about possible criminal prosecution of tea party groups for alleged violation of IRS rules, says Judicial Watch, a government watchdog which obtained the material.

The conversations were in preparation for a briefing by Justice Department officials for Whitehouse's staff and for a Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Terrorism hearing.

In one exchange, Whitehouse says:

"I would urge that the Department and the Service get together and rethink whether in these two specific areas, which I think bear little resemblance to traditional tax violations and are in fact very plain-vanilla criminal cases …"

He asks whether "the Department could not proceed to… put together a criminal case showing a fairly straightforward false statement or a fairly [straightforward] shell corporation disclosure violation."

According to Judicial Watch, the organizations Whitehouse mentioned included American Future Fund, Crossroads GPS, Americans for Responsible Leadership, Freedom Path, American is Not Stupid, Inc., RightChange.com II, and A Better America Now — all of them conservative organizations.

"The Obama IRS scandal includes abuse of power by Democrats in Congress who wanted to jail Obama's political opponents to help secure Obama's reelection," Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said.

"And Americans should know that the courts have recently concluded the Obama IRS abuses haven't stopped — even as we approach another presidential election."

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Judicial-Watch-Democrat-Senator-DOJ/2016/09/13/id/747995/?hl=1&noRedirect=1

we have a saying here,that "no Crow will put out another Crow's Eye"!

On the positive side, the more obviously insane any proposal is, the less likely it is for it to gain enough traction for us to worry about.

Look at California's track record and repeat that to yourself....

Follow Marc Dice around Cali and convince me you believe that....

Hillary Supporters Endorse SHARIA LAW in AMERICA!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKosd0xJadE



just sayin....

Well, but with that you are yourself CHOOSING to believe a distorted version of what is actually going on. It is NOT true that any significant number of people, even in California, "endorse Sharia law in America."

I think that's hyperbole.

I think at best it could be said "Tom Steyer wants to nullify the bill of rights applying to corporations."


This is kind of a distortion.

It would be more appropriate to say "...allow the government to not treat businesses as individuals with individual citizen rights."

All the things stated here, "regulate" churhces, tap the ACLU, seize records and internet searches, veto power over the NYT, can all be avoided by individuals in corporations taking on more liability.
CEO's and shareholders being individually liable for what the company does.

As it stands shareholders, CEO's, business owners reduce liability to themselves via LLC, incorporation.


Oversimplified, "Oh, what my company does, I'm not responsible for. So if my company dumps toxic waste in the river, well you can't come after me personally, as CEO, for doing it, you can only go after the company and what the company has. Therefore the company is its own individual entity. Oh yeah, because the company is an individual entity, then it can give money to PAC's and campaigns of politicians that are pro toxic waste river dumping. And the company can give millions and millions and millions of dollars to PAC's and candidates, to cap the amount a company can give interferes with the first amendment. Since companies are an individual entity, they enjoy freedom of speech protection."

Tom Stayer: "That's not right! Companies shouldn't be considered individual entities, citizens, protected like individual people!"

This article: "Tom Stayer wants to nullify the bill of rights and take away protections from everyone!"