Are Rock Bands Always Better While on Drugs?
Pop culture maven (and alleged writer) Chuck Klosterman argues that when Aerosmith left drugs behind circa the mid 1980s, it stopped being "one kind of band" and started being "another kind of band." I propose an amendment to this thesis: while on drugs, they were pretty good; and when not, they were distinctly not good. This pattern seems to hold often enough to be a significant trend.
Aerosmith can be compared with the Rolling Stones, who were, according to the commentary, frequently or always high from 1968-1972 when they produced their best recordings. Over the next few years, when the band, discerning critics seem to agree, degenerated into self-parody, they were apparently also high all the time. As such, drugs are not the only relevant factor. And, plenty of older rock bands become tribute acts to themselves, while sparing the public of sub-par new material.
The long-tongued bass player of KISS frequently interjects comments in interviews about how drug-using musicians are, shall I say, detrimental to the songwriting process. But the high water marks of the work of so many songwriters seems to correspond to their peak drug intake. What musical performers were better after their heavy drug-use phase?
Upload photo
Would you look at a profile that doesn't have photos?
Probably not! Upload a photo for others to be interested.
- Higher position in search results!
- Users with pictures get 10 times more responses in their messages
- Most people only contact those with pictures
Jenny
Lina
Anna
Jessica
Dony