the only reason for govt emails is because she illegally used a
private server and the dnc hack is a totally different event

it does not matter

supporting a russian government hacking of ANY americans emails is pretty offensive and troubling

it does matter the point is her using a private server put at risk all
emails on it

he said if you did i hope you release the xxxxx number of lost emails

he never showed support for actively hacking anything

if they hacked killery's email server it would show her inept ability
to be secretary of state not to mention her inept ability to be prez

smokescreens

he still showed support for Russians regarding the allegation they were hacking

Obama would be being persecuted for what he 'didnt' do/say in response or should have done instead,,,,

smoke screens yes but the smoke is coming from the left that refuses
to understand the consequences of their action and refuses to admit
they did something that created the issue to begin with

if she had no private server then no one could hack it if anyone has
actually hacked it

and there is still no actual evidence released proving the russians hacked
any one

can anyone say weapons of mass destruction in iraq (hhhhmmm)

where is the proof

You have to ask the CIA and FBI who both have determined it happened about the proof, although Im sure there is something kind of irresponsible in them opening that information to the world

but they are the same trusted sources that discovered the information thats so widely repeated and accepted about Hilary

accept both or accept neither,,

but

regarding responsibility

if she did something wrong, she should be held accountable

her doing something wrong does not , however, absolve any wrongdoing that comes after it

like taking a foreign governments hacking attempts and making light of it in a show of encouragement

and doing so with email server

does not mean it carries over in the dnc hack

they are 2 different actions

just because you get a accused of something

and then it happens again and no evidence is offered t prove it
does not mean you did it

hacking government information by a foreign government puts americans in potential danger

encouraging such ACTION is irresponsible

Hilarys email is considered GOVERNMENT INFORMATION

Trump encouraged a foreign government to hack Hilarys emails

No, Trump didn't say that he supported hacking by Russians.

Here is what Trump actually said during a July 2016 press conference:

"Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing. I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press."

Later Trump tweeted, "If Russia or any other country or person has Hillary Clinton's 33,000 illegally deleted emails, perhaps they should share them with the FBI!"

(quote source)

So, what Trump actually said was this: if Russians hacked into Hillary Clinton's private server, then perhaps they have all of Clinton's missing e-mail.

Trump was jabbing Clinton, not promoting hacking.

he was jabbing clinton with a statement that encouraged hacking,,,


or 'finding' emails,,,

he did not encourage he said if they did

and its killery's emails not the govts emails if she has govt emails
on her server thats on her she is not the govt her private proberty is
just that and if her private email server gets hacked any govt info
recovered by such a hack is her doing not anyone else's

Trump said something in jest. He said, "If Russians were hacking."

You are reading something into Trump's remarks that isn't there.

its so hard to tell, he jokes so often about crime,,,

like claiming he will pay legal fees for assault
or claiming he gropes women without invitation
or claiming second amendment supporters could maybe 'do something' about Hilary
or claiming he would like a foreign government to hack official government email


he is so 'funny' that way,,

Wow.. its a wonder anyone voted for him... Oh wait.. they did. Blacks, whites, women, Latinos;.. ect..ect. gonna be a tough 4 years for some Lol

yes,

and some slaves wanted to remain slaves

voting against self interest is nothing new

? where did the slaves come it from?, Nobody is a slave here and anyone can leave the U.S.A anytime they want..

Why do you always seem to throw slaves into the conversation?

ancient history..

btw, the Irish were actually the 1st slaves, although in all my years ( and I'm Irish) I have yet to hear any Irish person bellyache about it.

ya see... they moved on

most black slaves were enslaved by other blacks and then sold to the muslim slave auction

And if I am not mistaken white men fought (and died) to right that wrong... but that always seems to be overlooked.

irish were indentured servants, not slaves,, debtors,,,with full rights and citizen status after serving their servitude,,,with children not BORN into the status,,,




slaves came in
somewhere around where 'blacks' voted for him

I dont know why I 'seem' to 'alway's throw slaves into the conversation because I post about non slave topics far more than I mention slaves,,,

on THIS continent,, the land of the 'free' most black slaves were owned by whites,,and mostly those in the south