I disagree

all the ifs they would haves,, are irrelevant

we deal with what they DID

or more to my point,, what SHE did


her 'covering up' does not prove anything but her fear of being caught (as kids are known to have)

This is pretty much my sentiments whether she meant to or not a man died.
She DID intend to commit robbery.
She didnt report it
She didnt render aid at any time.
She chose to do what she did and she will pay for it. It is sad of course it is and yet she did the crime, she will do the time.

The state, should have fried her.

They should give her credit for time served and then execute her.

There are grown woman who stay with battering husbands who BEAT THE CRAP out of them, out of a combination of fear and love of that person. Yet people are willing to kill someone for having been a teenage for not having what equates to BRAVERY (to risk jail and/worse by turning in her accomplice)


sad

she wasn't a killer, she was a dumb scared kid thief


the heartless culture really is overcoming the fabled "American Dream"

,, explains a lot about things happening today in this country

yea, Sharia Law would have been much better.

This thread isn't about Sharia Law.

It happened in the USA.

I'm just saying that if she had lived in another country, maybe she would have received a softer, kinder sentence instead of facing the cruel US justice system.

yes,, just like celebrities and social media participants may be facing execution for badmouthing politicians,, instead of just cyber arguments with other participants,,

it can always be worse, never stopped any topic of debate before though,,,,

Execution for badmouthing politicians? Ive never heard of that. Sounds like fake news.

I think one would need to review the evidence and what her role really was. In my experience the legal system is not about justice but political bargaining. Prosecutors will charge the max they think they can, then often offer a lesser charge in exchange for a plea deal which is less work. Any "news" that is reported is most likely missing some information about what really happened.


I would be more interested in knowing if they were rehabilitating her so she is not a danger to herself or society before she is released.

so do all democrats think that laws are there for their interpretation only?

when a law is broken, the laws also states the penalties for breaking it...

but it seems the democrats wanna pick and choose which laws to enforce, the penalties for it, and if they should serve time for it...


she broke a few laws, and is paying the price... not much else to it

I for one am aware.

She was sentenced to a term that included a minimum, which she has served.

my comment was that I was hoping that her minimum(by law) would suffice and she could (by law) be permitted another chance

maybe the courts know something we don't... we don't know all the issues with it..

That's right, or maybe the Parole Board knows more than we do. She gets a hearing like all the other prisoners and the family of the victim has a say too.

my guess would be returning to cover it up has something to do with it

but like you said we dont know the rest of the story (where's lee harvey) when ya need him lol

she may have a bad attitude and be a trouble maker in prison

all i know the victim is still dead

and there are many countries where she would have been dead over 20 years ago

A woman killing a man or an accomplice to killing a man under Sharia law, the woman would be executed. She wouldn't even get a fair trial.

Actually her sentence was life without parole, and that has not been served.

She got Life Without Parole. There is no parole board in this one.

No teen should get this sentence without at least a hearing when they turn 21.