Well, in the state of California, or in any state
recognizing equality in divorce proceedings, half
of joint assets/income are awarded each party.
So one might assume the person seeking the prenup
has no interest in sharing half of it.
Maybe they had it a long time, first.
Maybe they have been through it once or twice already.
Maybe there are children to protect.
Whatever the reason, they feel a need to limit the
after-the-love-is-gone distributions.
I am ambivalent about it, I can see pros and cons
of them.
I thought that in California a person could only get 50% of the INCREASE in the other person's assets from the date of marriage to the divorce date. Is this true?