It is in determining how to treat those who have not where the only disagreement lies.
For instance, it is odd to me that illegal immigration is so often equated to prison and dangerous people. Most don't believe or want to believe that the immigrant and illegal immigrant population commit a lower rate of crimes than native born Americans. It is a fear tactic politicians use to paint the picture of illegal immigrants coming in and causing rampant crime.
IT is odd to me that 'HUMAN rights' are so easily discarded with laws that basically encourage profiling people, assuming their citizenship should be checked, especially tying that need to incarceration, instead of the same type of passion into following the MONEY, the people who directly benefit,, THE EMPLOYERS.
Remove the incentives, remove the crimes. Tomorrow if alcohol were once again illegal to consume, we would have a rise in other crimes and far more 'criminals' in jail. There is no criminal market if there is no crime
THe golden boy Reagan used this approach; going after employers, providing amnesty to those who resided without breaking any other laws, and increasing border patrol(jobs, not walls). However, farmers protested and the Chamber of Commerce went to work defending employers and vetting laws were eventually laxed (for employers).
AS someone who has gone through the immigration process and who loves their family, my heart does 'bleed' for those who simply want a chance to feed and provide for their families and cant afford to wait years to be able to have that chance. Not people who come here and harm others, those who come here to help their families. The narrative that its simply breaking the law or not or that illegal immigration is suddenly some massive 'threat' is a way to , imho, isolate,demonize, and de humanize a group of people in order to justify their treatment.
Edited by
msharmony
on Wed 04/05/17 06:27 AM