Agnostic,witches , or just spiritual with the universe. These are much more accurate terms. To be atheist you have to deeply control your thoughts but you believe in so much littleness its almost silly because in the end you believe Something cane from nothing and the Something continues soon, rethink it intimately you believe something do some research on it , people trip out sometimes when my beliefs hit the air but I love it because I have facts and strong opinions backed up o in the end prop will listen to me and I can open up minds. Not change someone's beliefs but get there minds open to new ways of thinking that aren't really that crazy

And Rooster... if you bother to read the history books, you'll realise that all the main stories in the Bible are just plagiarised from earlier cults... virgin births, walking on water, sons of god, resurrections... the same stories have been used for thousands of years BEFORE the Bible. Basically all have their origins in nature... the sun appears to die at night and be reborn in the morning. Early humans didn't understand how that happened, so they made up stories. In 2018, we know the earth is spherical not flat (Bible says flat) and that night and day are due to it's rotation (Bible doesn't mention many scientific facts because they were not known by the MEN who wrote it!)

If something can't come from nothing, then where did god come from?

No. If atheist you believe an unfalsifiable hypothesis that any human interpretation or assertion of divinity is a descriptor of an unhealthy psyche. It's classic disassociative antisocial behaviour prevalent in youths with poorly developed socialization skills. The kind who tells children there's no Santa, where the child is a mother mourning her dead baby and Santa is finding some sense of relief in mundane religious assertions.

The fact is an unfalsifiable hypothesis is unscientific, plain and simple. So if you say there is absolutely a god others must believe in or if you say there is absolutely no god for anyone to believe in then either way you're being unscientific because the subject is, by definition as ascendant of physical rules, untestable. So any absolute answer is an unfalsifiable hypothesis as it cannot be physically tested, one way or another.

But everyone is entitled to their opinions on likelihoods. Just don't go around outlawing people's brains when they're doing no criminal activity. Nor should you assert an unfalsifiable hypothesis, which is physically untestable as adherent to scientific method. There is no way to test the conclusion there is no god, just as there is no way to test there is. That means neither are scientific conclusions, they're both just falsifiable hypotheses as far as scientific method is concerned.

There is a difference between any higher entity, and creatures. God as a higher entity doesn't need a body, a creature's body needs to be created. That's why human beings rely on God and never question his existence.

the question about a god existing will never be answered until there is a way to measure the supernatural. but I think specific God's can be disproven wholly. that's just my opinion. the question that atheist answers is a question of belief. Do you believe in a God? I don't, so by definition I'm atheist. agnostic answers a question about knowledge. Do you Know that there isn't/ or is a god? so you can have a nostic theist, someone who knows that there is a god, a agnostic theist, someone who leans towards there being a God. or you can have a nostic atheist, someone who is 100% sure that no gods exist, or a agnostic atheist, someone who leans towards the idea that there are no gods, but is open to the idea if proof is presented.

but just because we don't know what happened a second before the big bang, doesn't mean that a god did it either. the answer is simply I don't know. and that is a reasonable thing to say, it's honest. to say that a god did it because I don't have a better explanation is a logical fallicy. its the god of the gaps argument.

finally I read one of the responses and it said atheists have faith as well. I can't speak for all atheists but I can say that is not true. the Bible says that faith is the belief in things that are not seen. so in other words, faith is the belief in something without evidence and defended against all evidence. if a atheist is presented with a better explanation about something, we change our minds to line up with the best evidence. that's how we learn. theists can't and won't change their minds about anything.

I am an atheist because the existence of a god or gods cannot be proven. The Bible is a collection of stories that have been rewritten many times over the centuries.

Atheists believe we evolved from space matter. Theists believe they came from nothing.

the same place green eggs and ham came from...

RE-wrote it and left a lot of **** out apparently.. but then Billy Shakespeare had a bunch of other slop to write when king James not LeBron commissioned him to revise the handbook of the lost and weak minded... and still so called believers need someone to interpret it for them and direct their misguided (but from the heart🤣🤣🤣) faith... indeed a sucker born every minute best they have something to keep their simple minds occupied...

Perfect answer. I think the same way.

I'm looking at the topic and thinking the same of your god, heh.

Put it this way: who created your god? If he doesn't believe someone created him, then he must be an Atheist too right?!

Not sure how someone who isn't me is more qualified to label myself more than than myself, but atheist is more accurate in my opinion (for myself). Doesn't it mean "without belief in gods? Which is exactly what I believe and how I choose to conduct and view the world. Witch is just a derogatory term for people who believe in the power of nature (and with in the self) rather than an authoritarian leader who preaches to others on what an imaginary entity "spoke" to them. Spiritual requires I believe in supernatural beings, which I don't.

As for believing " something came from nothing"; maybe I do? I have no idea how the universe came to be and neither do you. You only have a theory. I choose not to worry about it. Life in the "here and now" has enough troubles to over burden my psyche rather than to hash over what's been here for thousand of years came to be. It's the distant distant past. I don't care. And when it's over, I'll be over; so,...I don't care.

But for theist, they do definitely believe "something came from nothing". o
Otherwise,where did the hocus- pocus Soccer god(s) who made everything from nothing come from? Some things,NO ONE will never truly KNOW.🤷 I wish theist would just believe what they want and stop forcing those beliefs on me. I don't want it!

No offense but nothing you've said is profound or mind blowing. I've heard these arguments before. I have lots of beliefs. I'm an atheist... maybe agnostic but choose to say atheist because I BELIEVE that what people call gods are personification of natural events, not supernatural. they aren't caused by or control by anything but the laws of natural. An a more sinister hand, gods are fabrications use to dominate, control and exploit others for things we want or hate. I BELIEVE there are no entities in the skies, below or in another dimension or realm that control , grant, watch, reward or punish human actions.

I'm very different from other ATHEIST, In that I don't mind if people say I have beliefs, faith or even a religion... religion is a practice..I just do it with no gods and no book just what I see observe and FEEL. I'm not a very logical atheist not a logical thesist. logic has never ruled me unfortunately. I'm the same type of person with beliefs in gods and without. Turns out I never needed the supernatural and I still don't.

im calling it: Atheist pronouns in 2032

Nothing never existed. Learn some physics!

"That's why human beings rely on God and never question his existence."

I'm a human being, find it impossible to rely on a man-made concept and question everything! Ron