Science can be an enemy for a religion.
Yet world without science gets stuck from any development.
It is said Science without humanity is bad science
World needs science with humanity to make it better
HA! Dream on.
Like I said in the beginning of this thread...
Humanity needs both.
One does not nullify the other.
All science has no passion.
All religion has no reality.
Both exist within the other.
For some reason most people can't grasp this concept.
They feel a need to defend whichever they believe.
For them, it must be one or the other, never both.
sorry Tom, I have to disagree here... science is a quest for knowledge, religion is a test of faith... science deals with reality, religion deals in fantasy... science is about logical thinking, religion is about sentiments and feelings... science has proven most things that are told in the Bible are false, and couldn't have happened...parting the red Sea, turning water into wine, people living for thousands of years....
I do agree with you.
The only exception being that human beings are the ones doing the science and human beings have beliefs and even follow religions.
Since human beings are a reality, belief and faith are a reality.
Belief and faith do not require a religion but most that have belief and faith follow some type of religion.
Personally, I see religion as delusion but I know people can follow religion and still do science.
I see no reason one can not do science and be religious.
is someone considered a scientist if they spend their life trying to prove a unicorn is real? Same thing with a god, it can't be proven or unproven...science was a sin for hundreds of years by Catholics, because it didn't glorify God...I'm sure there's a few smart religious folks out there, but most simply don't care for science, because they're afraid that be proven wrong by the only thing that can, science...
I understand what you're saying.
I agree with you.
Consider for a moment Einstein's Cosmological Constant (His personal greatest failure). He couldn't justify this problem because of his religious beliefs. His religious beliefs didn't invalidate all of his theories. By your assessment, because he was a religious man, he couldn't embrace science.
http://www.sciencemeetsreligion.org/physics/cosmo-constant.php
Fantasy and belief drive scientific discoveries.
You might be interested in checking out this site...
Explore the inventions, technology and ideas of science fiction writers at Technovelgy (that's tech-novel-gee!) - over 2,500 are available. Use the Timeline of Science Fiction Invention or the alphabetic Glossary of Science Fiction Technology to see them all, look for the category that interests you, or browse by favorite author / book. Browse more than 4,300 Science Fiction in the News articles.
http://www.technovelgy.com/
Even religion drives scientific discoveries.
Could the Flood have really happened?
Discovery of large underground aquifers.
Religion poses a theory and science seeks to either prove or disprove it.
Which results in science being done.
The Earth is the center of the Universe.
Science looked to see if it was.
Science and religion work together to try to explain reality.
There are still a lot of things that can't be explained.
As long as there are things that can't be explained, both science and religion are needed.