Interesting. So the character of Jesus, a literary and astrological hybrid, is most explicitly a plagiarism of the Egyptian sun god Horus.
Jesus was no literary and astrological hybrid. He was a real historical figure, and there's plenty of extra-biblical evidence for his existence.
Golly....where to begin?
Lets see... shall we start with Tacitus, first century Roman historian, mentioned a new religion of "superstitutious Christians who suffered under Pontius Pilate during the reign of Tiberius" and were following a leader named Christus (Latin for Christ)
We have Pontius Pilate and his written report to the roman Emperor about his actions in having Jesus crucified.
We have Suetonius, chief counselor to the Emperor Hadrian who wrote that there was a man named Christus who lived during the first century in his Annal15.44 .
There is Julius Africanus quoting the historian Thallus about the "darknes covering the land upon the crucifixion and death of Jesus the Christ"
We have Flavius Josephus the Jewish historian. In his writing "Antiquities" he refers to James, "the brother of Jesus, who was called the Christ"....as well as this saying recorded in his writings that says "Now there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him a man. For he was one who wrought surprising feats....He was [the] Christ...he appeared to them alive again the third day, as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things concerning him.
Then of course there is The Babylonian Talmud (Sanhedrin 43a) confirming Jesus' crucifixion on the eve of Passover and the accusations against Christ of practicing sorcery and encouraging Jewish apostasy.
Lucian of Samosata was a second-century Greek writer who admits that Jesus was worshiped by Christians, introduced new teachings, and was crucified for them
Also listed is Pliney the Younger, in his Letters 10:96 records early Christian worship practices including the fact that the new religion converts worshiped Jesus as God and were found to be "very ethical, loving, and kept something called the Lords Supper" as "followers of the Christ".
We have Polycarp, Polycrates, Victronius, Eusebius, Iraeneus, Justin Martyr, Origen, Jerome, Clement of Alexandria, Beatus, Tyconius, Primasius, Caesarius of Aries, Augistine of Hippo, and a lot more.
So YES, there ARE historical recorded writings naming Jesus Christ as a real person, NOT some myth. Then consider one other thing. From the time of Nero, but especially during the reign of Domitian onward, there were continuous persecutions and executions of thousands and thousands of the new converts, or, Christians. A man might die for a belief in someone who lived and was believed in, but what would be the purpose of the thousands dying if it was for a lie? Why? Logic doesnt fit. Sorry.
So, if you want to claim that Jesus was a literary and astrological hybrid, then you are just dead wrong. Period. This isnt talking theology, religion, whether or not he was the Messiah or even claiming he was God....it just confirms from secular history that he DID exist in the flesh as a real person.