Really?
74%.. is 74%.. don't care how you try to spin it.
Absentee fathers in the black community is no surprise to anyone. It has been a well documented problem, even by the black community.. for a very long time.
And blacks have lead that category out of every other ethic group.. since the beginning of this issue bring documented. Which is decades. Constantly on top of the graft and pie charts.. constantly.
My point is simple, enough of the marches.. change by example...individual responsibility. when they do that, then and only then will the numbers decrease.
Yes. 74 percent is 74 percent. But the topic was about what has happened SINCE 1995(Million man march)
at that time the unwed rate was 70 percent and has now risen to 74 percent, which is a SLOWER rate of increase than any other group, including whites who went from 32.6 percent to 40 percent during the same time
AND looking at the trend BEFORE 1995, a great decrease for blacks who had increased nearly 15 percent in only 15 years
compared to the rates of others which remained constant
There is only documents of UNWED children, there is no clear study on actual living arrangements that determine who is 'present' or not
And yes, blacks have lead since they started keeping data, but this topic is about MARCHES and their effects.
everyone could apparently use some examples, if the only determinant is about whether numbers decrease or not.
But in a culture where cohabitating parents is increasing, and the number of those seperating but not divorcing is on the rise, I would not look to 'wedlock' statistics as indicator of whether fathers are being fathers.
Edited by
msharmony
on Sat 01/20/18 03:15 PM