Okay. Good luck with that. I would hope its not another armed staff who was thinking the same when they see your gun.

I am wondering where he got the money to buy the guns that he had?
anyone know?

I believe he had a job.

We do ban things. We ban small toys that can choke kids, we ban certain types of chemicals for foods, et cetera ... it doesnt lead to banning 'everything'

it isnt an all or nothing situation.

He had an inheritance. Apparently his mom had money

http://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost.com/2018/02/20/woman-who-took-in-florida-shooter-wants-control-of-his-inheritance/amp/

maybe instead of trying to solve the problem in its entirety
focus on something specific...without the argument that doing
so is the first step in taking away ALL guns ???

so whats the problem with banning sale and manufacture
of......bump-stocks ???

is there any valid reason for them ?

well this has been up here about an hour and half now and
i don't see anybody promoting bump-stocks and nobody has
argued that it will lead to confiscation of anyone guns either..

have we found some common ground ? a compromise perhaps ?

so why don't we do it, not after breakfast, not tomorrow, not
next week....do it NOW

how about another specific ?

any objections to the registration and mandatory
backround check requirement for the private sale of firearms ??

Moe's right....thia is not a national gun registry....its a gun confiscation tool for the NWO....UNCONSTITUTIONAL...
........................................................end of line....

ok Argo, couple of questions... Who's paying to do this? How are they going to get a half billion guns in the database? What happens when one gets stolen, and someone winds up dead from it a few weeks later? Who maintains this database? What would be the penalties for someone breaking this law?

Sorry, it doesn't seem a very feasible idea at the moment...

there is already in place registration and backround check
data base for licensed arms dealers (gun shops) you can "what if
this/what if that", all day long...so, i'll reiterate this is
SPECIFIC to PRIVATE SALES only...shouldn't those sales follow
the same laws as a licensed gun dealer is required to ???

@ Moe..

you asked me some questions..i answered
i dont think private sales come remotely close to
half billion weapons///what ifs, i tried to answer...

your opinion of feasibility is valid and i understand it

it's not an argument...i'm looking for common ground

it is common ground, I have no problem with it, but like I've said before, I really don't think anything should be done until they look at the prescription problem first... Major corporate owns the US, and they dictate laws in their favor... If these drugs are "unsafe", then why are they still being prescribed? Granted that it may be a small percentage of those who take will wig out, but if that is a problem, then maybe changing meds or not taking them would save some Innocents lives...

if you do a search on mass shooters on prescription meds, I came up with over 50 websites on it, here is one...

https://www.naturalnews.com/039752_mass_shootings_psychiatric_drugs_antidepressants.html#

What is the scientific evidence for an association between psychotropic drugs and homicidal behavior? Most of the available studies are case reports that only suggest a coincidental link between violence or homicide and antidepressants or benzodiazepines, while very little is known about the association between antipsychotics and homicide. Two recent ecological studies found no support for a significant role of antidepressant use in lethal violence in the Netherlands or the U.S., although data on individual offenders were not available. Quantitative data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) adverse event reporting system imply that some antidepressants may be associated with a disproportionately high number of violent events. On the contrary, two small studies on antidepressant use among a special subgroup of homicide-suicide offenders found no evidence to support a causal link between antidepressants and homicidal behavior.

There are three crucial conditions that must be fulfilled to properly study the putative association between exposure (i.e., use of a psychotropic drug) and outcome (homicide): a) the sample must be unselected, to be representative of the total offender population; b) the reason for prescribing the medication must be considered and controlled, and c) the effect of other concomitant medication(s) must be adjusted. No such studies have been done thus far on the association between the risk of committing homicide and the use of psychotropic drugs.