Fact v Opinion
Doesn't always matter.
I mean it doesn't matter if it's a fact you never cheated on your boyfriend if their opinion is that you did.
It's part of the decision making process.
What's more important in the context of your wanted/needed/desired outcome.
Of course sometimes it absolutely matters.
It doesn't matter if it's a fact most birds can fly, your opinion that flapping your wings like a bird will keep you aloft when jumping off a building won't change the outcome.
Only a quarter of U.S. adults in a recent survey could fully identify factual statements
That doesn't mean much.
For all I know the surveyor called during dinner and most people wanted to get off the phone so just randomly selected a few options.
For all I know the surveyor group targeted specific people and worded the questions in a biased way.
Surveys and polls are worth little more than opinion when they aren't accompanied by the factual information in how the information was obtained and couched in very specific phraseology including limiting conditions.
The study also found that when Americans call a statement "factual" they overwhelmingly also think it is accurate.
How can they make this conclusion?
For all I know they think it is accurate and are therefore calling it factual, rather than calling it factual and thereby believe it is accurate.
And for all I know the people polled have information available to them the pollsters don't that actually prove the "opinion" given in the context of the conversation with the pollster as factual.
Whats the difference?
A fact is a statement that can be proven true or false. An opinion is an expression of a person's feelings that cannot be proven.
Based on that definition, then, it's a fact that all Chinese people type with their toes when no ones looking, and that I love my mother, wife, or kid could never be factual.
I mean, I do think a science or med school student needs a bit more logic and analyzation skills than a major in English ...
I think you're wrong for a couple of reasons.
I think a "major in English" would need far more skills in logic and analysis than a science or med school.
IMO it takes far more logic and analysis in order to figure out where another person is coming from, how they are communicating, how they are using words, how words are heard and understood, what associations and definitions people are using, perspectives of stories, or whatever an "english major" actually means, to go back and forth from their influences, to overcome your own inherent social biases, for objectivity, and then figuring out how to translate the biases you objectively define they have, translate them through your own biases objectively in order to understand them, then try to objectively communicate that to others, as opposed to analyzing a static object or natural phenomenon that can be accurately reproduced over and over and over again.
At best it's the same degree of logic and analysis needed, but understanding and being able to switch perspectives to communication biases is just as important as "logic and analysis" for an "english major."
Other than that, I disagree that a science or med school student needs a "bit more."
I think "logic and analysis" is what's "supposed" to be being taught from grade school to everyone, the same degree, so people can apply it to what they want in the future, whether it be english or science or med school degrees or just plain jobs.