why dont you tell us what we dont know then? what exactly do you know that we dont know?

Ive said this earlier Anyone can be charged under RICO statue today, getting a conviction is another matter.

i already HAVE told you what they have done that would make the trump organization eligible to be prosecuted under RICO...
[like fraud,obstruction of justice,collusion,fraud,and even more fraud!]

its not my fault that you are desperately biased,and not objective enough to read it,or accept it.

but,why dont YOU do an intense study of the FACTS,and everything that the trump organization has ever been accused of,list ALL of the things that make a organization eligible to be prosecuted under the RICO act,and then explain to everybody WHY you think that these things DONT make the trump organization eligible to be prosecuted under the RICO act,and i will tell you if you are right,or just desperately grasping at straws because you are biased.

[and,please....
show your work!!
cuz,opinions dont count in a court of law,unless you are a judge,or on the jury!!]

Bottom line, end of story he cant. RICO was designed to take a criminal organization like the Mob off the streets for good. That's not what this is. Even if charges happen it wont be RICO. Plus this would be a Kangaroo Court and they definatley wouldn't try RICO in a Kangaroo Court.

sure seems funny that the whole time you are DESPERATELY denying that trump did anything that they can use to enact RICO with,you are blatantly overlooking...

(06/14/2018)
the MULTIPLE fraud charges that the state of new york is now bringing against trump for his fraudulent charity that he has been using to pay his own personal debts out of,which is as open and shut of a case as you could posssibly get,[and EVERY check that was written to pay his own personal debts with is a SERARATE/DIFFERENT charge!!!](and THOSE are STATE charges,that mike pence cant pardon him for!!! lol )
[those charges by themselves count for more than 2 charges!]

(04/09/2018)
the judgement of the courts against his 'trump university',where the judge ruled that trump was guilty of fraud,and ordered him to pay 25 MILLION dollars in restitution to the people he defrauded.
[again...i am sure that every one of the people he defrauded would count as separate charges to be used against him!]

(06/03/2018_
the admission on national television where he publically admits that he dictated don jrs misleading letter of denial in the russian collusion case,[which proves that he DID know about it!!!!]

(05/02,03/2018)
all of the OTHER stuff that his feebleminded lawyer,rudy guiliani has admitted on national television that trump knew about/did,and lied about

(01/26/2018)
the obstruction of justice charge for firing james comey to try to stop the russina investigation.

not to mention,all of the OTHER obstruction of justice charges that robert mueller is about to prosecute him for when he wraps up his investigation.]

06/20/2018) [....."Trump's personal attorney is 'willing to give info' about the President".... that news headline just came out TODAY!!!] lol

so, who knows WHAT ELSE they will find after his crooked lawyer/fixer rolls on him to save his own skin from spending the rest of his life in jail.
[and he sure has A LOT of dirt to spread!!!] lol

ANY of those things qualify to charge him under RICO,as they establish an obvious pattern to his lack of respect for the law,and a willingness to use his organization to break the law...

sure seems funny that you ignored/neglected to mention any of THOSE things!!!

why is that??

is it just sloppy research??

political bias?

or is your ommission of them because that you cant rationalize them in a way that doesnt REALLY make you look like you are DESPERATELY grasping at straws??
remember...i TOLD YOU to show your work!!!
cuz,i have absolutely no problem showing MINE!! lol

BUT,now that I have brought them up...why dont you try to explain how ALL THOSE things dont incriminate him enough for the D.O.J. to enact the RICO act?
and,remember...please show your work!

this has nothing to do with his campaign, when he was president elect or president
nice try.




this has nothing to with his campaign or presidency




Provide proof of this claim, because as I understand it , It was Trump's legal team letter to the Mueller that address it.



Your opinion, that doesnt make it fact.


if there was an obstruction of justice he would have been impeached by now.



and Im sure he will get a 7 figure advanced from Random House too, and your point is ?





Again that is your opinion, these are not facts.




Now that Ive seen your evidence, I will say based on what you've posted, the Chances of Trump being indicted as as likely as Hillary Clinton being the next attorney general for Trump.



you've just posted your bias Dave, nothing here is new, you obviously got this from some whacked out left wing Anti Trump site.

My conclusion is Can Trump be indicted? yes he can, there is precedent, Nixon was about to be impeached and removed and Clinton was about to be impeached and he signed an "information" avoiding the grand jury.

Will Trump be impeached? the more Ive read the answer is NO.
Most of us figured out Mueller strategy they want to indict him, embarrass him , try and find him guilty so they can remove him but instead force him to resign.

a pretty sh_tty strategy which will back fire.

mark my words

sure seems funny that the whole time you are DESPERATELY denying that trump did anything that they can use to enact RICO with,you are blatantly overlooking...

(06/14/2018)
the MULTIPLE fraud charges that the state of new york is now bringing against trump for his fraudulent charity that he has been using to pay his own personal debts out of,which is as open and shut of a case as you could posssibly get,[and EVERY check that was written to pay his own personal debts with is a SERARATE/DIFFERENT charge!!!](and THOSE are STATE charges,that mike pence cant pardon him for!!! lol )
[those charges by themselves count for more than 2 charges!]

(04/09/2018)
the judgement of the courts against his 'trump university',where the judge ruled that trump was guilty of fraud,and ordered him to pay 25 MILLION dollars in restitution to the people he defrauded.
[again...i am sure that every one of the people he defrauded would count as separate charges to be used against him!]

(06/03/2018_
the admission on national television where he publically admits that he dictated don jrs misleading letter of denial in the russian collusion case,[which proves that he DID know about it!!!!]

(05/02,03/2018)
all of the OTHER stuff that his feebleminded lawyer,rudy guiliani has admitted on national television that trump knew about/did,and lied about

(01/26/2018)
the obstruction of justice charge for firing james comey to try to stop the russina investigation.

[not to mention,all of the OTHER obstruction of justice charges that robert mueller is about to prosecute him for when he wraps up his investigation.]

[06/20/2018) [....."Trump's personal attorney is 'willing to give info' about the President".... that news headline just came out TODAY!!!] lol

so, who knows WHAT ELSE they will find after his crooked lawyer/fixer rolls on him to save his own skin from spending the rest of his life in jail.
[and he sure has A LOT of dirt to spread!!!] lol


ANY of those things qualify to charge him under RICO,as they establish an obvious pattern to his lack of respect for the law,and a willingness to use his organization to break the law...

sure seems funny that you ignored/neglected to mention any of THOSE things!!!

why is that??

is it just sloppy research??

political bias?

or is your ommission of them because that you cant rationalize them in a way that doesnt REALLY make you look like you are DESPERATELY grasping at straws??
[remember...i TOLD YOU to show your work!!!]
[cuz,i have absolutely no problem showing MINE!!] lol

BUT,now that I have brought them up...why dont you try to explain how ALL THOSE things dont incriminate him enough for the D.O.J. to enact the RICO act?
[and,remember...please show your work!]

this has nothing to do with his campaign, when he was president elect or president
nice try.




this has nothing to with his campaign or presidency




Provide proof of this claim, because as I understand it , It was Trump's legal team letter to the Mueller that address it.



Your opinion, that doesnt make it fact.


if there was an obstruction of justice he would have been impeached by now.



and Im sure he will get a 7 figure advanced from Random House too, and your point is ?





Again that is your opinion, these are not facts.




Now that Ive seen your evidence, I will say based on what you've posted, the Chances of Trump being indicted as as likely as Hillary Clinton being the next attorney general for Trump.



you've just posted your bias Dave, nothing here is new, you obviously got this from some whacked out left wing Anti Trump site.

My conclusion is Can Trump be indicted? yes he can, there is precedent, Nixon was about to be impeached and removed and Clinton was about to be impeached and he signed an "information" avoiding the grand jury.

Will Trump be impeached? the more Ive read the answer is NO.
Most of us figured out Mueller strategy they want to indict him, embarrass him , try and find him guilty so they can remove him but instead force him to resign.

a pretty sh_tty strategy which will back fire.

mark my words

^
^
"My conclusion is Can Trump be indicted? yes he can, there is precedent,"

there you go!!!
you just admitted that you agree with the point that i made,so TECHNICALLY,i am right!

no matter how much you wish that it WOULDNT happen,if the D.O.J. decided to pursue it under RICO,it COULD happen!!!

all the rest of your desperate denials are nothing more than YOUR OWN political bias showing itself!!

point/match...ME!!

Was I speaking in tongues or Swahili? I know I wasn't speaking in French .

Dude , anyone can be indicted, heck a Roast beef sandwich made with Swiss cheese on rye imported from Denmark can be indicted.

Convicting is another matter.

And if you read what I wrote slowly, you would have seen that I said I seriously doubt Congress would Impeach the president

Did you miss that part? why you think I agreed with you is nuttier than my Neighbour Aunt's can of Nutbutter she makes for Christmas.

Just because someone can be indicted doesn't mean they will be indicted

duh.

the rest of what you wrote was just white noise to try to distract from the fact that what i originally wrote is true...

that trump HAS commited enough crimes to qualify him to be prosected under the RICO act if the D.O.J. wanted to pursue it that way,and i dont really see ANYWHERE where you countered my points with anything except MEANINGLESS denials,and opinion,without any FACTS to back them up.

and,the FACT that THAT is all the rebuttal that you have to offer just thoroughly validates MY argument that much more!!!

so,keep on desperately denying my points without any verifiable facts to refute them,because i find that absolutely
HILARIOUS!!!

sorry, Ive presented facts and countered your bias argument Dave, sorry to inform you but facts are facts and opinions are like azzholes, everyone has one.

You have to prove Trump committed crimes during his campaign and as current commander in chief, what he did during is private sector life is irrelevant.

The Russian collusion accusation and obstructing of justice is what is on the table, his affairs with Stormy Daniels is just a witch hunt



no Dave, you've offered nothing but straw man arguments, you haven't offered any actual facts just more of sophistry.





Im glad I can make you laugh Dave, I guess when you are trying to deflect because you cannot make a point

I can deflect too, I sometimes scratch my balls when Im playing baseball, does that mean Im uncouth or my balls are itchy ?

LMAO!!!
what 'facts' are you talking about??

all you have offered is opinion,and desperate attempts to dodge answering my facts that i have plainly presented.

nothing that you say has anything to do with RICO,or offers anything except a glimpse of somebody that is desperately trying to use meaningless personal opinions,and political bias as facts to dodge the REAl facts of what RICO is,and what the requirements are to qualify for a RICO case in the eyes of the law.

the information to the REAl facts is out there for anybody with the correct number of chromosomes to view,so your feeble attempts to ignore them is absolutely HILARIOUS,and your lack of a proper rebuttal validates the facts that i have presented!

Dave, Dave, Dave

relax sport, you're about to go into full meltdown, grab some herbal green tea or decaf ( I dont know if they sell Swiss decaf down there)

Okay, now breathe ...

Back to the topic.

You keep posting the same thing over and over and over again, just because you post it over and over again doesnt mean its the truth.

I know what RICO is

Now here is your challenge if you chose to accept it

name all the crimes Donald trump has committed according to the 35 crimes as defined by the RICO statue as is pertains to him being president
President elect
and when he kicked off his campaign.

can you do that without the silly commentary

and if you dont know when he kicked off his campaign its June 16, 2015

IM going to you a favour and post a link that has the Federal Prosecutor manual to RICO crimes

https://www.justice.gov/usam/file/870856/download

so after you find the crimes post them here for us to see which crimes Donald Trump committed and we can discuss and debate.


You're welcome

sure seems funny that the whole time you are DESPERATELY denying that trump did anything that they can use to enact RICO with,you are blatantly overlooking...

(06/14/2018)
the MULTIPLE fraud charges that the state of new york is now bringing against trump for his fraudulent charity that he has been using to pay his own personal debts out of,which is as open and shut of a case as you could posssibly get,[and EVERY check that was written to pay his own personal debts with is a SERARATE/DIFFERENT charge!!!](and THOSE are STATE charges,that mike pence cant pardon him for!!! lol )
[those charges by themselves count for more than 2 charges!]

(04/09/2018)
the judgement of the courts against his 'trump university',where the judge ruled that trump was guilty of fraud,and ordered him to pay 25 MILLION dollars in restitution to the people he defrauded.
[again...i am sure that every one of the people he defrauded would count as separate charges to be used against him!]

(06/03/2018_
the admission on national television where he publically admits that he dictated don jrs misleading letter of denial in the russian collusion case,[which proves that he DID know about it!!!!]

(05/02,03/2018)
all of the OTHER stuff that his feebleminded lawyer,rudy guiliani has admitted on national television that trump knew about/did,and lied about

(01/26/2018)
the obstruction of justice charge for firing james comey to try to stop the russina investigation.

not to mention,all of the OTHER obstruction of justice charges that robert mueller is about to prosecute him for when he wraps up his investigation.]

06/20/2018) [....."Trump's personal attorney is 'willing to give info' about the President".... that news headline just came out TODAY!!!] lol

so, who knows WHAT ELSE they will find after his crooked lawyer/fixer rolls on him to save his own skin from spending the rest of his life in jail.
[and he sure has A LOT of dirt to spread!!!] lol

ANY of those things qualify to charge him under RICO,as they establish an obvious pattern to his lack of respect for the law,and a willingness to use his organization to break the law...

sure seems funny that you ignored/neglected to mention any of THOSE things!!!

why is that??

is it just sloppy research??

political bias?

or is your ommission of them because that you cant rationalize them in a way that doesnt REALLY make you look like you are DESPERATELY grasping at straws??
remember...i TOLD YOU to show your work!!!
cuz,i have absolutely no problem showing MINE!! lol

BUT,now that I have brought them up...why dont you try to explain how ALL THOSE things dont incriminate him enough for the D.O.J. to enact the RICO act?
and,remember...please show your work!

i already have named several,complete with dates,and all you have done if COMICALLY offer your DESPERATE denials,and opinions,without any facts to back them up,or any knowledge of what actually constitutes a valid RICO case,which only validates my own argument.

rofl

so,thank you for playing.

you can pick up your parting prize at the exit!!
waving

this has nothing to do with his campaign, when he was president elect or president
nice try.




this has nothing to with his campaign or presidency




Provide proof of this claim, because as I understand it , It was Trump's legal team letter to the Mueller that address it.



Your opinion, that doesnt make it fact.


if there was an obstruction of justice he would have been impeached by now.



and Im sure he will get a 7 figure advanced from Random House too, and your point is ?





Again that is your opinion, these are not facts.




Now that Ive seen your evidence, I will say based on what you've posted, the Chances of Trump being indicted as as likely as Hillary Clinton being the next attorney general for Trump.



Gibberish.


Yeah yeah yeah, you're a barrel of laughs Dave, 3000 comedians out of work and let me guess you are one of them?

for your viewing pleasure I decided to re-post my original post to you , countering your every "fact"

did get you the herbal tea or decaf?

Let's see Trump the violator of the Rico act as some would say or Hillary the murderer of countless thousands ..hmm let me think on this... one who violates the RICO act as you say or one who puts the lives of every citizen at risk for "convenience"..whom shall I choose I don't know yet ..I'm still thinkin" ...

There are those of us with EYES WIDE OPEN" that have turned away from watching the bouncing ball thrown out by the main stream media..there is far more at risk than the" battle of the blue and red"..it is US aginst "THEM" no matter what party they may claim allegiance to they are one and the same under their sick and twisted alliance..the onion has only started to be peeled..

There is a lot more to come ..it goes a lot farther down the rabbit hole.But the MSM and the so called "elites" have more diversionary tactics at hand and these are merely nothing more than distractions thrown to the masses like a bone to a pack of dogs ..now watch them fight amongst themselves tactics that have long been overly exposed..

But as the Main Stream Media continues to throw every bone they can they will slowly come to realize that their last futile attempts are in vain..For their archaic tactics that they have relied on to fool the masses through every brainwashing attempt no longer works..Technology has replaced the main tool they have used over the decades and the "idiot box" has been replaced with the internet and the knowledge that the masses have needed for so long..Perhaps they should go back to the time of their ancestors and start chiseling out their messages on rocks..because no one is listening any more..we know who they are and they know who we are..


We Are ANONYMOUS..We Are Legion...