No. Sorry. Obama didn't really do anything, well, positive at least.
just averted a potential depression, speaking of what 'would have happened if' .....
No, he didn't.
At best he averted the opposite (prosperity) through the fed and continuing Q.E. leading to more of a stagnation.
The bailouts and Q.E. were started under Bush.
Obama simply had the option to continue what Bush started.
...Obama chose to continue what Bush and that congress had already passed.
just potentially saved US automaking industry and Wall street
Not really. He didn't "save" them so much as strong armed them into a political style bankruptcy, through the unions forcing automakers to take government money to save union jobs, which decimated shareholders, and forced GM to layoff thousands....but the company name and unions (pay) were saved.
He "saved" wall street by doubling the national debt and pumping a trillion dollars a year of free money into the system. Kept it from going down, but inhibited it from going up.
He robbed peter to pay paul so peter couldn't hire anybody and paul could feed his kids.
just potentially reversed the trend of hemorrhaging hundreds of thousands of jobs A MONTH
Huh? "Potentially?" That seems to be saying "he might have possibly could have done something maybe."
I don't think he gets credit for that...
Other than that, using federal statistics (which is probably not the best idea, since that is another Obama accomplishment, he changed how a lot of things are measured, like applying double+ seasonal adjustments, which paint a magically more rosy picture, or relying more heavily on the birth/death model to calculate new jobs opening, like if %50 of the u.s. is employed, 100 people die, 50 are born, then that must mean 25 "new" jobs!) u.s. companies increased foreign workforce more than domestic every year he was in office.
And remember what Obama kept promising to do? On the campaign trail, in office, and congress fought him on?
Raise tariffs, accuse China of currency manipulation (although Obama did want to avoid a trade war so didn't).
just over saw a switch in the health system that gave millions more a chance at affordable coverage
A "chance" at coverage most people couldn't afford to use as the deductibles were too high, with the following years the premiums doubled, tripled, or more (and deductibles rose), leading to a rapid increase in health care costs, decreasing benefits, decreasing options, forced more people into medicare/medicaid, and losing their preferred doctor when promised they could keep it, promised it wasn't a tax then ruled legal due to it being a tax, wasted half a billion on the website.
Is that a positive? More people could afford to pay an insurance company but not actually use the health insurance, or use it and not get what they needed? Or get what they needed and then find out next year they couldn't afford the coverage?
just oversaw the taking out of the terrorist leader OF that time
His positive accomplishment is that he watched people kill a guy, or his actions led to the capture of a guy that was killed?
IF we are going to get into all the 'what would have happened if', scenarios, I believe he did plenty
He did a lot.
Not much to anything positive.
And in doing all that he pretty much doubled the national debt.
Hypocritical to say the least
I'd say delusional and/or ignorant more than hypocritical.
Each side has their own narrative they wish to see, and avoid actually seeing anything beyond.