Who cares lol but what about that elephant painting though
I’m in love
Higher intelligent animals can be trained to paint on canvas.
They don't just find color and paint tho.
They have to be outfitted by humans.
But, what they draw comes from their mind, unless they are being stimulated by a human.
Birds create complex song and dance on their own.
It is a known fact that ancient people used battery powered lights during pyramid construction. To do so, those crude batteries had to have been invented first. Pyramid builders also used pictographs in pyramid construction, a writing that had to be invented before it was etched in rock.
To use a quote from Alien VS Predator (2004) where is "Moses's DVD collection"?
Where is the alien fossil record?
Doesn't it seem odd that paleontologists can find ancient humans and evidence of farming, hunting and camp making but find absolutely no evidence of alien footprint? Aside from some occasional crude cave painting?
Some will say the Nazca Lines are landing strips for alien astronauts.
This makes no sense for a couple reasons.
First the nature of the lines being in the form of pictographs of animals
but more importantly, because as crude as human space flight is, we don't need a landing strip to land on another moon or planet. If aliens were advanced enough to visit the Earth and cross such vast distances, don't you think they would be able to land without directions from the local planet's inhabitants?
Most likely, the Nazca Lines were made because they observed shooting stars and thought they were intelligent life or Gods and were trying to talk with them using pictographs (their form of written language).
Baloney Detection
How to draw boundaries between science and pseudoscience
http://homepages.wmich.edu/~korista/baloney.html
4. How does the claim fit with what we know about how the world works?
10. Do the claimant's personal beliefs and biases drive the conclusions, or vice versa?
http://www.openculture.com/2016/04/carl-sagan-presents-his-baloney-detection-kit-8-tools-for-skeptical-thinking.html
Occam’s Razor. This convenient rule-of-thumb urges us when faced with two hypotheses that explain the data equally well to choose the simpler. Always ask whether the hypothesis can be, at least in principle, falsified…. You must be able to check assertions out. Inveterate skeptics must be given the chance to follow your reasoning, to duplicate your experiments and see if they get the same result.
It looks like you didn't see the drawings but the important thing is thank you for your information