Who am I talking about?
Not really.
There are too many vague generalities that could apply to far too many "world leaders" throughout history.
You could be talking about Bugs Bunny or Mickey Mouse in Disneyland/world.
I found this hysterical, though:
the man (Obama) had a history that backed up his words in terms of his goals and values
I agree. He had a history in law, and he knew how to manipulate it and the story he used to justify his behavior in getting around it.
Dazzle people with BS so they don't notice the crap piling up behind.
Like a lawyer. The truth doesn't matter, only what you can prove, the winner is the side that can make the best argument as to their version of it.
The admiration of Obama (and especially the attacks on Trump) is proof that image is more important than depth.
Other than that, it seemed he (Obama) was pretty divisive for a community organizer.
he also came in during near recession, and left us better than he found us.
This is the funniest of all.
This is like saying "OMG! We almost lost our house to the bank until this bankster arrived. He was kind enough to make us rich by putting us into twice as much debt as before. With that money we can make minimum payments on our current debt and cover our tax bill, with a guarantee our children have to pay our debt once we're gone (plus a mandate we have to use certain contractors on specific dates to do repairs, whose costs keep going up, making sure our children will have to assume more debt to pay off the extra debt)....But at least we get to stay in our house, that's better than before he came by. He saved us!"