Wait, are you saying that if a girl goes to a sex party, the boys cant just jump on her?

LOL, thats what girls like that are for.

She was a certain kind of person, so those boys were right to pin her down, and prevent her screams, and try to rip off her clothes.

The fact that she got away, and escaped thru the bathroom window, was their cue to just find another girl like that. They moved on. no problem.

The fact that her therapists notes on the matter are available doesnt even matter. She told her therapist about it for sure because she was so upset. That just proves she's the nut job. Probably so upset because those boys wouldnt date her.

Reminds me of Bill Cosby, they didn't care what 'kind' of girl the accusers were, only if he acted outside of the law.

Reminds me of Donald Trump, they didnt care what 'kind' of girl the accusers were, or what 'kind' of guy he was, for that matter.

generalize much?

Cosby started with one drugged out accuser referring to an incident from decades before which she has ADMITTED making up for book sales. However, that ONE person, emblazened the numbers that came after her, and through their numbers and statements from Cosby, ended up convicting him in the public arena and then in the courts.

The jury was not made of isolated individuals who had no access to the news cycles BEFORE the trial.

yes, six white men, four white women, one black man and one black woman, none of which, regardless of which side picked them, had been isolated from the media storm that happened BEFORE THEY WERE CHOSEN.

Im familiar with the US jury system, Ive actually been called to be on it, have you?

Im familiar with the US jury system, Ive actually been called to be on it, have you?

both sides put forth their arguments on which to save and which not to based on how they answer certain questions and jurors can answer questions in the way that will get them selected or relieved of duty.

but none of that was my point. My point is, in the case of allegations of sexual harassment of assault, there is, often times, little 'evidence' besides the word of those making the accusation, and the perception of those whose duty it is to hear the accusation.

there will be some cases, where certain people will see the women as just whores and opportunists looking to ruin a man, and other cases where certain people will view the men as monsters and the women as helpless unwilling victims.

In any case, this is the situation the SCOTUS candidate now finds himself in. He is not isolated. He is not the first or the last. He will have to answer questions and in that, he is also not isolated nor the first or last. the ONLY difference is the CONTEXT of His situation, which is not as an entertainer, or a movie producer or director, but a SCOTUS JUDGE Who will have to interpret the rights of citizens from all walks of life.

There is no telling what perception will win out.

it may be that 'that woman/those women are whores and opportunists and he is a great normal guy' (as with Trump or other Ivy league rich boys who had 'harmless' parties with 'whores' or used their position with 'opportunists')

or it may be that 'that woman/those women are victims, and he is a spoiled rich kid/man who felt it was okay to be a sexual predator because no one taught him differently and his environment reinforced the idea that it was okay for boys to behave in such a way (as with Cosby)

I honestly don't know which perception will win out. But I cant wait for the testimony to be completed so we will know what the status is for the SCOTUS candidate, and move on to the next political issue.

Bill Cosby has now been labeled a sexual predator. He's about to go to prison for it. As far as Brett Kavanaugh goes, it still remains to be seen. Either way, if he is found guilty, he is no better than Bill Cosby. They deserve cells right next to each other.