Topic: Polygamy- Multiple Wives - Would You?
Reply
George1976's photo

George1976

Thu 10/04/18 01:00 PM

Yes there is a tribe in the Amazon where a woman can have as many husbands as wants wants
I_love_bluegrass's photo

I_love_bluegrass

Thu 10/04/18 01:56 PM


So would I be correct in saying, that from your point of view, that to have a biblical polygamist relationship, the man must be the head of the household, and the women, must not have sex with each other?
Is the head of the household, another way of saying, the 1 who is in charge? If not, then what exactly, does this mean?
And I fail to understand, why its unbiblical, for the women to have sex with each other should they wish to.
And furthermore, I really don't understand, what any of this has to do with the bible


Guys *always* make with the BS about how two women tohetjer is Ok/ sexy/ "natural"...but two guys together is gross/disgusting..
Can you say "hypocrite"?

If someone wants to claim gay (same sex) sex is sinful/ wrong...you don't get to cherry-pick which instances *you* think are OK..

I am a woman, and I have NEVER had the desire or curiosity to see how it would be to be with another woman...
Anymore than the majority of guys ever have the desire/ curiosity to see how it would be with another dude...



no photo

The Wrong Alice

Thu 10/04/18 03:47 PM

I love bluegrass, I tried to pm you. But apparently I'm ineligible to. Basically just wanted to say that you had a great profile, and that I agree with you
I_love_bluegrass's photo

I_love_bluegrass

Thu 10/04/18 04:20 PM


I love bluegrass, I tried to pm you. But apparently I'm ineligible to. Basically just wanted to say that you had a great profile, and that I agree with you


I've rectified that R2d2r2d2...
BigD9832's photo

BigD9832

Sat 10/06/18 09:10 AM

I don't think I could live with several women. I can only imagine all these women having PMS.

The is a TV show from HBO called Big Love. But this family is rich and can afford three houses. That might work.

Dodo_David's photo

Dodo_David

Sat 10/06/18 09:15 AM

When a man wants to have more than one sex partner, he will make up all kinds of excuses for what he wants, even if he has to read into the Bible something that isn't there.
BigD9832's photo

BigD9832

Sat 10/06/18 11:46 AM


When a man wants to have more than one sex partner, he will make up all kinds of excuses for what he wants, even if he has to read into the Bible something that isn't there.


I'm not saying that the Scriptures condones this, but there is nothing in the Bible that says sex outside of marriage is a sin. Assuming, of course, you are not married.

But people will make all kinds of excuses to prove themselves right. Even if he/she has to read something into the Bible that isn't there.

no photo

Happyolegal

Sat 10/06/18 03:23 PM


Yes there is a tribe in the Amazon where a woman can have as many husbands as wants wants


Thank you now I know to avoid the Amazon:grin:
BigD9832's photo

BigD9832

Sat 10/06/18 06:35 PM

I didn't know you could get a husband at Anazon.com.
no photo

Happyolegal

Sat 10/06/18 06:39 PM

what would I do....I shall put myself in your wife's position. To let my husband become emotionally and physically attached to another woman pretty much tells me I am letting you have your way because I fear losing you. No this isn't working as wife number one, I wld leave and if I really wanted a child I would foster an older child. I couldn't raise a child to accept such a life.
no photo

Goingforasong

Sat 10/06/18 06:48 PM


I didn't know you could get a husband at Anazon.com.


You can't,Bezos is into bondage and slavery.He's got them all tied up.:wink:
Godwill82's photo

Godwill82

Wed 04/17/19 08:49 AM

One man one woman is the best . To my opinion
G12ing0's photo

G12ing0

Sat 05/04/19 11:06 PM

Now I'm not a polygamist but I have a question.. if we are all complex carbons built around an atom then our protons neutrons and electrons are the equivalent to republicans democrats and neutrals.

So if we found multiple carbon structures to find a better molecule in a time where carbons are replacing carbons who are we to judge.
msharmony's photo

msharmony

Sun 05/05/19 04:32 PM

From a woman's perspective, I would say no. If they are both equal, why marry one and not the other? or, if you cant marry one, then why marry the other? That is not equal at all. If they are equal, neither should be married. That would not change the laws or who the children had for a father.

I believe in each man or woman having their OWN wife or husband.

I believe, however, there are people who don't hold that 'biblical' design in such esteem or care about it much at all. I imagine some can have a version of love that they are able to spread to more than one at a time. I think such a love is selfish, personally, unless like others have said, the female can also have more than one person to 'love' romantically as well. But that is just called an open marriage. A relationship where one has to 'wait' in any line for a partner who never does, is not a partnership where the same level of loyalty is expected from and given by both, and not one that I would personally desire.


Edited by msharmony on Sun 05/05/19 04:37 PM
msharmony's photo

msharmony

Mon 05/06/19 12:51 AM


From a woman's perspective, I would say no. If they are both equal, why marry one and not the other? or, if you cant marry one, then why marry the other? That is not equal at all. If they are equal, neither should be married. That would not change the laws or who the children had for a father.

I believe in each man or woman having their OWN wife or husband.

I believe, however, there are people who don't hold that 'biblical' design in such esteem or care about it much at all. I imagine some can have a version of love that they are able to spread to more than one at a time. I think such a love is selfish, personally, unless like others have said, the female can also have more than one person to 'love' romantically as well. But that is just called an open marriage. A relationship where one partner has all of two others, but the two others have to share one is not a partnership where the same level of loyalty is expected from and given by both, and not one that I would personally desire. It is just like cheating for me, albeit some people are fine with being the 'other' who is always available to the one, who in turn continues to have their pick.





Jaden5t's photo

Jaden5t

Sat 06/01/19 09:30 PM

So your saying a man can have all the wifs he wants but they can't have no one but him
Not fair
Lpdon's photo

Lpdon

Sun 06/23/19 11:40 PM

Ugh, women are difficult enough as it is just being with one. Imagine having a bunch. I know guys like it because of the sex and they want obedient women. To me I find it selfish and disgusting and most of all disrespectful to women.

Besides, just realize when you make one little mistake and your one wife goes ballistic on you, and well if you have multiple wives then your going to get that multiple times and trust me women stick together against me, always!
no photo

The Wrong Alice

Mon 06/24/19 01:25 AM

But is it 'biblically' ballastic?
no photo

Sheri

Mon 06/24/19 06:42 AM

If i was in a relationship with a married couple i wouldnt feel that i had any legal rights. I would always feel like the third wheel. I would always have to ask permission in anything i need or want. I would Not feel very comfortable being in a situation like this. I dont like sharing anyways.
dragonsphere4u's photo

dragonsphere4u

Fri 06/28/19 08:36 AM

I believe in Polygamy Life Style, because its not only natural, but its also a practice that is not sinful. Think about it, for a moment.
in the days Jesus walked the Earth, there were no such tribes, called Mormons. So, people cant label in discrimination, calling it a Mormon Practice. FALSE! What happened is, Mormons used the practice in bad ways, which gave the Polygamy Practice a bad name. Perfect example, the man who is in prison, and yet he still gives orders to his compound down their to murder people in cold blood, claiming its from God.
Yet, we both know, Satan is very deceptive, a father of lies, and can pretend to be God. Thus, Satan is telling that man to send out his minions to murder people in cold blood, and hes a Mormon. Maybe not as LDS, but a break away substitute, never the less.

I found a man once about 5 years ago, who proved other Christians are Hypocrites, and Bible verses proved it. I wish I had my CD-ROM with me, as I saved those for a purpose.

Now, women wanting multiple husbands, is a sin. Its called Polyamory. Nothing in the Bible recognizes this. Sorry ladies. Yet if a man can love equally his wives, and not create jealousy, by loving one more than the other, I don't se a problem with this. People got to get their minds out of the gutters, or they are sinning as well, by thoughts. (That's in the Bible as well; and Judge not lest ye be judged)

Right now, we are Sodom and Gomorrah. The fact that God hasn't destroyed USA, is a miracle at best. Gay marriages, be it a man to a man, or woman to a woman, is unnatural, mental instability and disturbed, and not what was ordained by the Heavenly Creator.

In Exodus, it says, and God is too perfect to make mistakes, or counterdict Himself. "Any man who lays with a man, like that of a woman, shall be condemned." He destroyed Sodom & Gomorah, (Gay City and Lesbian City) because they pissed him off. Sodom, is obvious, and thats why the Gay city named themselves that. Duh!

So, in the end times, even though they legalized Gay Marriages, not one Gay man or Lesbian Woman will be in heaven. All gay men, and Lesbian Women will be cast to burn in Hell forever.

Then the Gay people made the worst offense, by changeing Gods words, by making the Gay Bible, called the New Queens Version. In Revelation it clearly says; "Any man (woman, cause the word man is part of the word woman; God was smart there, and is backed by Adam & Eve's creation) who adds to, or tkes away from the word, and all the curses of the word (Bible) shall be added unto them."

So again, Gay people will burn in hell, not goto Heaven, if not for their Gay Practice, then for changing Gods true words, and the truth about Sodom and Gomorah.

So Polygamy isnt a sin, UNLESS; you do it in lust. Now that's the catch-22. I a man seeks this in lust, then yes, its a sin. BUT, if he does this cause he loves them equally, then its not. What a husband does behind closed doors, is his business, even if he loves his wives all at the same time. He's not obviously cheating on them, and at the same time, not creating jealousy. By marriage, the wives are not related to each other, known as Sister-Wives, who share their husband, and have children by him.

More importantly though, they all work together, to make their lives benefit. They dont harm children, they dont do obscene things in public or intentionally draw attention to themselves. If they dont act paranoid, then they wont feel like a 3rd wheel. Only those who believe, should enter the practice.

I hate discrimination, and by allowing the sick minded gay marriages, yet pick on Polygamists who believe in the natural order goes against God. So, if gay marriage is going to be legalized, then so should Polygamy. OR, make gay marriage illegal, since fair is fair. 'You cant have your cake and eat it too.'. By continuing to allow the Gay marriages to be legal, we are not Christians then, we are doing the work of the devil, and thats the same as worshipping Satan, not God. Its one way, or no way. And that's a political, corrupt government problem of many, that we have today, in USA...