Hypocrisy is alive and well.
First, it is interesting to note how quickly the overgeneralizations and tired political stereotypes have been used to blur and distract from the issue with what happened with Kavanaugh.
Democrats are an 'angry mob', but the white nationalists who rallied in Charlottesville had 'good people', interesting, but not surprising. Politics is a ridiculously "its the other guys' topic.
It is also interesting how 'the democrats are guilty' rhetoric is prevalent in these threads, yet I dont think ANYONE keeping this topic going is a registered democrat(just a hunch)
In comparing Clinton to Kavanaugh, what one is forgetting is the BEHAVIOR under questioning was not combative nor uncooperative, there was no LAME excuses like personal calendars, alleged virginity, evil look alikes, farts, or sensitivity to spicy foods
and the mistress never claimed an assault or even brought forth any complaints AT ALL, that was all CERTAIN republicans, who if the same standards are applied, USED Lewinsky and hung her out to dry after.
Another key difference is all women went to the PUBLIC media instead of authorities, with the allegations
Another key difference is in the grown women who accused Clinton did not appear to be doing so in an attempt to maintain anonymity,(all women went to the PUBLIC media instead of authorities), with the allegations so publicity was a potential motive there.
Another difference, The alleged incidents with Clinton were also at a time when they were GROWN women, one who met him in her hotel room.
Another difference is the proof of harm, which none of the women had either, as none (to my knowledge) had sought counseling or had evidence of any other sort that a trauma had occurred to them. One of the women signed an affidavit that nothing had happened to her (Broaddick) until interviewed by certain republicans, nothing fishy there.
and none of the women, to my knowledge, took or passed any lie detectors. There was PLENTY room for doubt, and much less to corroborate their claims.
PLENTY of difference in what happened then and now, except of course, the party allegiance in saving their 'guy'. (democrats and republicans)
and the mistress never claimed an assault or even brought forth any complaints AT ALL, that was all CERTAIN republicans, who if the same standards are applied, USED Lewinsky and hung her out to dry after.
___________________________________________________________________
yes, by all means it was the republicans fault.. they also unzipped Bill's pants .. Lol
The President got BJ in the Oval office.. while working.. with a intern young enough to be his daughter.. then when on national T.V. and lied to the world about it. Only when totally cornered like a rat, did he admit to it.
This is the man you defend... for one reason and one reason only.. because he is a Dem.
He embarrassed his country.. his wife.. his kid.. and made himself into a lying fool doing it... all for a BJ... Lol
can't defend .. fact.
The fault thing is a 'republican' comeback, I dont engage in it. I just stated the facts, they can be interpreted however one wishes.
Both parties were consenting ADULTS, age difference is irrelevant. Lying on TV about a consensual affair while one is still MARRIED is not surprising or a crime.
I have not 'defended' him at all. I have been cheated on. I have said his affair was wrong and also noted the havoc affairs have on a MARRIAGE, but not usually to one's job performance or standing.
The question is not about his impact on his family, the question was about the similarity to the INVESTIGATION of his behaviors to the INVESTIGATION into Kavanaugh. And once again, I am not a blind follower of any party or person. My opinions are MY OWN, and not based in party or race.
If it seems differently, maybe it is because in these threads the TOPICS are mainly bashing Democrats or liberals, and I am participating in such threads. If threads bashing republicans and conservatives were as plentiful, or even close to as frequent, I would 'defend' some of those as well.
