As the national debate over violent rhetoric rages among politicians, pundits and President Trump, the Republican candidate for governor in Pennsylvania offered the latest case study in partisan rancor on Friday when he threatened to “stomp all over” the Democratic incumbent’s face with his golf spikes.
http://www.yahoo.com/news/gop-candidate-threatens-pa-governor-im-going-stomp-face-golf-spikes-203326572.html
maybe they meant to say he was a democrat, you know, its those democrats that are so violent and prone to incite after all, just those democrats ...
that statement pales in comparison to the statements made by democrats . "Get in their face" Harrass them and let them know they are not welcome here" or we kick them" not to menchion shooting republicans playing ball. Yea real civil. No comparison no matter what you may think. Your wrong. Democrats have always been the bitter, immature and one sided , close minded and negative party.
getting in someone's face is pales in comparison to stomping someone with cleats? okay.
Bitter people are bitter, and they register both DEMOCRAT and REPUBLICAN
saying and doing are two differant things, or are you equating reality w/ non-reality as you do fact w/non-fact. Wake up and admit what is obvious.
First,the thread is about WORDS
and second, whether its words or actions, both sides have people doing it
and third, to be 'in someone's face' does not involve laying hands or violence
we have seen the examples of irresponsible words that may incite violence
and as far as action, do you not remember Trump inviting people to punch people and he would pay the legal fees and then one of his supporters actually PUNCHING a protestor on their way out the door?
you are right, reality is reality, and reality is republicans cannot pretend like the same types of instability dont exist inside their party that exist inside democrats ...
No one is saying it doesn't exist in both parties, but to compare that one is as bad as the other is ludicrous . No republicans go to an individuals home to harass and incite . No republicans go to a public gathering to harass and incite an individual , no republicans jerk a hat off a kids head and throws a drink in his face. To be honest Republicans are the more civil, after all the attacks perpetrated by the left, and none have taken an a** whipping yet. The republicans hold the high ground for now!
it is not something that ban be compared either way IS THE POINT
so i dont know if republicans harass people at their homes (My guess is they do)
But I do know they to go public gatherings and incite like other extremists do
I dont know if republicans jerk hats off kids, I do know they punch people who protest though.
to be honest I dont know what definition of 'civil' we will use, but when it comes to extremists, supremacists and other anti government lunatics, who I would not presume were considered demcorat or liberal in their ideas, do have the others beat when it comes to the kind of violence that actually causes harm and death
so the fingerpointing as if one is clearly so much 'better' than the other is nothing but an exercise in over inflated ego.
