The real difference is Kavanaugh was interrogated by a hostile gang that found him guilty before any investigation had begun and A.O.C.has been disputed and questioned by members of congress and the media who wonder how the country will pay for all her freebies. Intelligent folks see the differance.

do 'intelligent' folks worry about all the 'freebies' the other representatives and politicians are using?

Kavanaugh was interviewed for a JOB, he was questioned about an allegation, thats how the country works, someone accuses you of being unfit for a lifetime position as SCOTUS, you are given an opportunity to address it in an interview to determine the best candidate for said LIFETIME position. If any group of individuals should sail through and understand that concept, it should be a JUDGE.

not necessarily,but when the republicans are so UTTERLY DESPERATE to try to discredit their opponents that they dig up 'dirt' from her past and try to use it to embarrass her as a political strategy,but they are SO INCOMPETENT that all they can do is post videos that show her dancing and being cute,and adorable,i think THAT says A LOT about them,PLUS,it ALSO says A LOT about HER,if that is the best that they can come up with on her to try to discredit,or embarrass her!!

So many people in this country are quick to twist the truth into something that resembles their paranoid narrative . The hell with integrity as long as they can get the sheep to follow. The way our country works is a person is innocent until " proven guilty" no matter how many morons scream guilty or racist or sexist it's all just blather until the real facts come out.

and how do we go about 'proving' guilt without questioning the accused, exactly?


K is on the court, people can quit whinging and move on. He was a judge. he knows the process of being accused and answering to it, I never understood the pretense of being so offended by it. You are going to be a lifetime judge, you shouldnt be offended merely by questions unless you got something to hide.

as far as racist or sexist, thats a judgment call, not so much about 'facts' but what those facts mean.

Her priorities were no secret during her campaign. She was elected by voters in her district. Seems indicative of her constituents being in agreement with her agenda. Passionately working towards stated goals that those she represents voted in favor of by electing her should be commended. It's the level of performance that should be delivered by all elected officials, in my opinion.

it certainly seems to be the answer of Trump supporters to his negative criticism, doing what their CONSTITUENTS voted them to do ...


good for the orange goose, good for the young gander

it certainly seems to be the answer of Trump supporters to his negative criticism, doing what their CONSTITUENTS voted them to do ...


good for the orange goose, good for the young gander

Yes, AOC was elected to that district, in 2 years we will find out if they are happy with her representation. It just goes to show how divided our country is in different geographic areas. I doubt I could live in a district that far off center to the left; must be a nightmare!! I'm sure there are people that feel just as negative toward areas dominated by the hard right.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez isn't officially a member of Congress yet, and she is already having a temper tantrum.

From The Hill, 31 December 2018:



Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's problem isn't that she is a Democrat or a Socialist.

Her problem is that she believes that her election equals a mandate from all Americans.

No, it doesn't.

She was elected to speak on behalf of the residents of her congressional district.

She doesn't speak for everyone else in the USA.

It is bad enough that she is woefully naive about the complications involved in converting all America to 100% renewable energy.

Has she told her constituents just how much her Green New Deal would cost them? Of course not! She doesn't know how much it would cost. It is as if she doesn't know where New York City gets its heat during winter. Perhaps she doesn't.

Then there is this from economist Dr. Charles N. Steele: "Scientific economic analysis suggests radical responses are unnecessary, even if we accept the basic models of global warming. Economics also shows that attempts by government planners to redirect the economy will result in unsustainable catastrophe, not sustainable development."

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez still has much to learn about reality.