I know the history of effort to modify weather with cloud seeding but look at the OPs screen name!
I mean come on!
I did see the screen name ,in fact that is what drew my initial interest.However despite the fact that we assume he may hold questionable views in one area does not mean he is in error on this topic.I found the reporting to be credible,I may be gullible.
The first couple lines into the article I knew what it was about.
Sure roll the dice with our atmosphere and see where it goes!
Therein,lies the problem.You must enjoy playing Russian roulette :-)
The OPs original post implies that this is already being done, I suggest an air show for anyone in question as far as that goes.
The people pulling the strings on this geotesting is what I really fear along with the potential.
The main problem I have with the video is that it was released in 2010 which should be long enough for people to debunk the information presented.I'm sure there would be public records of contamination at Lake Shasta to compare.I do recall some association between the ferocity of recent fires in the Cali area which might be attributed to higher levels of aluminium in the atmosphere.
Inside the first 4 minutes I was done with the video. The most abundant green house gas in our atmosphere is H2o=clouds so creating more clouds to block the sun really isn't making sense at all. At night the clouds trap the heat generated during the day.
If this is any effort at beating coronal mass ejection they might as well pack it in and utilize the funds for more TBMs to make tunnels to hide in.
Our sun goes through an 11 year cycle that even the Aztecs knew about that I find far more worrisome. This and the diminishing geomagnetism of our planet as the radiation from the sun will cause weather and tectonics to go places we don't want to see.
