Public education is supported by the local property taxes, support from your state government and support from the federal government. The voters have control over the amount of funding from each by their votes. It has 0 to do with the value of the property and all to do with the local mill rate for schools levied on that property. The only effect of property valuations is in which home owner/renter gets to pay a larger amount not the total amount collected. When voters do not want to pay a larger local share they do not value an education and the education system along with the students suffer. I think what you are trying to point out is that in low income areas, the ability of the residents to provide adequate school funding is an issue. That should partially be offset by the state government funding. There is also the factor of what the local school funding is used for; it should not be used to fund social programs.
You failed to mention the role of a parent. It is the responsibility of the parent to send their children to school on time, rested, clean, and fed. Likewise at the other end of the day they have the responsibility to feed their children, see that homework is completed, and the child is in bed at a reasonable hour. It is not the responsibility of the school system to make up for the failure of the parents.
I agree with you here, but....I fail to see how the previous administration made things worse...
My dad taught me how to read....
And the alphabet.
He worked full time, was actually gonme a lot...but manged to do it.
(my mom couldn't because she was from Germany, and was relly still learning to read and write English herself..she could speak it fine..)
With a lot of parents today working 2 jobs, and *still not making ends meet easily, I see how they could be stressed out the point of not doing their part.
The solution to THAT is to make it possible for people to afford rent/ morgages and utilities and transportation (many areas do not have adequte public transport and therefore people need cars)...pay them enough so maybe mom COULD stay home if she chooses, and teach the kids that stuff and see to their upkeep..
Many post office workers, teachers, factory workers, store managers, etc. were QUITE capable of supporting a family on their income alone..
And, people back then *had* cars..took a vacation once a year....didn't live in poverty/ with nothing.
I know...the neighborhoods I grew up in all the mom's were at home, and people had stuff....and none of the dads were high-dollar professionals...
Here's where I lived before we moved to TN..(I'm weird that way that I still rememeber the address..and phone number...LOL)
Definately not ritzy, nor poor...
https://www.zillow.com/homes/for_sale/915-park-ave-garner-NC_rb/
Edited by
I_love_bluegrass
on Thu 02/07/19 11:45 AM