The average working person in the 50s and 60s lived a simpler life, expected less for a standard of living, and did a lot more for themselves. I remember very well what those years were like!!
Umhmmmm..here we go..*that* fallacy again.
No, people *didn't*, as a whole..
I grew up in a nice houses, went on vacations, heck went to summer camp...etc..
On my *dads* income.
People used to be able to support a family, buy a housw, and even send their kid to college...while working as a mailman, a teacher, a factory worker, a store amnagaer..etc..
Most women didn't work.
Sure..some didn't have a nice house, had a cheap second hand car...but the majority lived a better life WRT finances back then.
Now, people working two jobs, both spouses, most of them can't afford a house...can't go on vacations, save to send their kids to college...
And, the corporations aren't paying taxes, so...where's that "trickle down" the middle class should bve getting, if what you say is true?
Because, if they aren't being "forced" to pay taxes...why can't they raisesz wages...add benefits...?
Because they are too worried about their stock holders..
You DO know Henry Ford said f**k you" to his stock holders and bought back all his stock, because they complained when he wanted to raise his workers wags to where they could actually BUY one of the cars they were making..
"But Ford had an even bigger reason for raising his wages, which he noted in a 1926 book, Today and Tomorrow. It’s as a challenging a statement today as it as 100 years ago. “The owner, the employees, and the buying public are all one and the same, and unless an industry can so manage itself as to keep wages high and prices low it destroys itself, for otherwise it limits the number of its customers. One’s own employees ought to be one’s own best customers.”
http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2014/01/ford-doubles-minimum-wage/
http://www.mbiconcepts.com/henry-ford-crushes-shareholder-first-and-foremost.html
Edited by
I_love_bluegrass
on Fri 03/15/19 02:43 PM