Health warning issued after woman with measles went to 'Avengers: Endgame' screening

"The woman, who had just returned from an international trip, didn’t know she had the very contagious virus. She visited many other public places — including Los Angeles International Airport — over a period of four days before she went into voluntary quarantine".

If people get sick, this is how it will happen. By one of our own. Anything else is just fear mongering bullshyt.

You produce what.. ONE case.. as if it encompasses all and that's just Ebola..you do realize that other diseases crossing the border can kill as well..right?..

BULLSHYT was all that RUSSIAN COLLUSION and OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE ..that people screamed about for months..only to be WRONG.. ..

I wonder what UNBIASED sources they used for that...

..and let me reply with a gentle reminder .. and that your sources the mockingbird media can misinform or keep you uninformed as well..after all they have been doing it for decades

while we can toss back and forth biased sources ..it's all just part of the MATRIX charade made to distract and divided while they destroy our country..ENJOY THE SHOW

HERE COMES THE PAIN

White House lawyer to AG Barr: Mueller report 'suffers from an extraordinary legal defect'

"In a letter obtained by ABC News, White House attorney Emmet Flood wrote to Attorney General Bill Barr in mid-April regarding special counsel Robert Mueller's report into meddling in the 2016 election saying the findings “suffers from an extraordinary legal defect: it quite deliberately fails to comply with the requirements of governing law".

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/white-house-lawyer-ag-barr-mueller-report-suffers/story?id=62784735

"The letter squarely attacks the Mueller team for not making a decision on obstruction of justice, a federal crime in which someone "corruptly" attempts to “influence, obstruct or impede” the “due and proper administration of the law” in a pending proceeding, according to federal code" Meanwhile, what White House attorney Emmet Flood fails to acknowledge is DoJ policy prevents the indictment of a sitting president. That is why Mueller did not charge Trump and it is also why Mueller specifically tasked Congress to use their Constitutional powers in prosecuting the president. Flood cannot call himself an attorney if he cannot understand those legal facts in this case. The DoJ will not indict a president even with the wealth of evidence uncovered.


Mr. Flood omits a singularly important detail. Not being a legal scholar, I do not know where the presumption that the Justice Department, led by the Attorney General, a Cabinet member, may not indict a sitting president originated. I believe it is merely a convenient (for the President) custom, which has seldom been questioned or tested.

Yet it has served as the basis for the sort-of-declination on the obstruction grounds, which so confounds both sides of the question. While it is apparently true that the Special Counsel did, in fact, do the country a disservice by revealing so much evidence of questionable behavior which, depending on one's perspective, is either highly incriminating or not, hiding behind the premise that the President's own Executive branch prosecutor's office may not indict. Of course, Mr. Flood would opine that Mr. Mueller's investigation failed in its duty (from his one-sided perspective) to decline to prosecute on the basis of lack of evidence.

What would anyone expect him to say? The fact that the special prosecutor could not decline to prosecute (upon acknowledging that he was not permitted to even recommend prosecution to the House of Representatives, the ONLY legal authority with the right and the duty to charge the President, is de facto evidence the investigation determined there is more than enough evidence to impeach.

Whether on not it is wise to do so remains, as it should, in the decision of the House, and more specifically, the Speaker. Mr. Flood's abundant use of words stands in contrast to Mr. Barr's oversimplification, but both statements do the same injustice of obfuscating the truth while hiding behind a rule which isn't.

Maxine Waters Calls For Bill Barr"s Resignation, Get Embarrassed By Bob Mueller
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6rTGn7XXY3c

ROD ROSENSTEIN OFFERS GLOWING PRAISE OF BARR AHEAD OF MUELLER REPORT
https://www.newsweek.com/rod-rosenstein-william-barr-praise-mueller-report-release-1399200

DEMOCRATS PRAISED WILLIAM BARR BEFORE TRUMP NOMINATED HIM
https://www.peoplespunditdaily.com/news/politics/2019/01/15/democrats-praised-william-barr-before-donald-trump-nominated-him/

DEMS PRAISE MUELLER AS INDEPENDENT COUNSEL
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GopVO4vDz1c



what a difference a day makes..as soon as the Dems don't get the conclusion they want..they turn ..we should investigate all of them next..starting with Hillary and Obama and work our way down..I think we are..

As far as what I have said about the border and what's coming over and this investigation..watch what happens in the next six months..time will be my vindicator..GOOD LUCK everyone..Tombs out

I find that people have moments of support and moments of objection, especially over a period of decades, when they can make many decisions and take many actions.

Im sure, going back twenty or thirty years, we can find every politician has once had support from one side or another at some points and not at others.

Yahoo news: Overall, we rate Yahoo News! Left-Center biased based on aggregation from more left leaning sources as well as editorial content that slightly favors the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting (original content) due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record.

Seems that they factually report the news but twist the words to reflect their left leaning bias! They are not a neutral, centrist news source.

I think what it means is that since they are a news aggregation service, which post their own original stories, and ALSO stories from all types of other links to other news sources, that the choice of other sources stories is from left leaning, but that their actual ORIGINAL reporting is factually accurate.

Which is to say, if you go to yahoo news, you will find hundreds of links to other sources. You will also find links to stories that originate with Yahoo. I believe that the stories originating with Yahoo are factual. but that the OTHER links from other sources, seem to mostly include links from left leaning sources.

Rod Rosenstein Quits, Thanking the President Who Trolled Him

"Rod Rosenstein is ready to jump. The deputy attorney general, who has run the Justice Department’s day-to-day operations for most of the Trump presidency, submitted his resignation to the White House on Monday. The letter said he will stay on until May 11".

http://www.thedailybeast.com/rod-rosenstein-quits-thanking-the-president-who-trolled-him



Translation


The shyt is getting too deep. I'm getting out while the getting is good. Before the door slams on "me". Boy, he sure changed his tune in the last month. I bet they have something on him and told him he either retires or goes through a long investigation.

His resignation letter shows him doing due diligence in him being viewed as a "company man". When his paperwork has been completed & his spoils/golden parachute has been proven to be irreversible, methinks this man will become a songbird singing a tune EVERYONE will be interested in hearing!

I will not argue that Yahoo does or doesn't lean left. But what I will argue is whether the story is true or not. I've said it a bunch of times, at least what I post is the truth. What I post has either already happened, or it's about to happen. No rabbit holes here. I know that any news service can get a story wrong. That happens to the best of them. I've seen Yahoo print a retraction because they got a story wrong. So far though, I've never caught Yahoo in an outright lie. Just lying for the sake of leading people wrong.

I've never seen any of the news sources I post deliberately post lies to lead people in the wrong direction. No far flung conspiracy theories. Just political news of the day. And no rabbit holes.

Firefighter Union Leader Responds After President Trump Lashes Out Over Joe Biden Endorsement


"Trump lashed out at the country’s largest firefighter union on Wednesday, claiming to have “done more for Firefighters than these dues sucking union will ever do” after the organization endorsed former Vice President Joe Biden in the 2020 Democratic primary".

http://time.com/5581002/donald-trump-firefighter-union/

This is what happens when you have too big of a mouth.

Trump doesn't understand that unions very seldom endorse Republican candidates. Republicans have been anti-union for many decades. Trump may not be but whether he is or not they'll almost always endorse Democrats. nevertheless, the endorsements really don't mean much as the rank & file pay little attention to it. They vote the way they want to.

In the president’s most recent budget proposal, which has little chance of becoming law, he proposed cutting the Assistance to Firefighters and Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response grant programs by $700 million, according to the Congressional Fire Services Institute. The budget document also proposed cutting the State Homeland Security Grant Program and the Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) by one-third, and also zeroes out the “State Fire Training Assistance, a program that allows the National Fire Academy to partner with state fire training academies in delivering its classes at the state and local levels.” The budget would also cut the Volunteer Fire Assistance and State Fire Assistance programs.



Here’s what President Trump has actually done for firefighters

"President Donald Trump on Wednesday morning woke up and decided to attack the International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF), one of the most powerful and politically active unions in the country after it endorsed former Vice President Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential race".

http://thinkprogress.org/trump-biden-firefighters-record-disaster-relief-fires-zadroga-sprinklers-d5dafb372e25/




Exclusive: Foreign government leases at Trump World Tower stir more emoluments concerns

"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. State Department allowed at least seven foreign governments to rent luxury condominiums in New York's Trump World Tower in 2017 without approval from Congress, according to documents and people familiar with the leases, a potential violation of the U.S. Constitution's emoluments clause.

The 90-story Manhattan building, part of the real estate empire of Donald Trump, had housed diplomats and foreign officials before the property developer became president. But now that he is in the White House, such transactions must pass muster with federal lawmakers, some legal experts say. The emoluments clause bans U.S. officials from accepting gifts or payments from foreign governments without congressional consent".


http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-emoluments-exclusive/exclusive-foreign-government-leases-at-trump-world-tower-stir-more-emoluments-concerns-idUSKCN1S80PP


Just When Trump Thought He Was Out, Bill Barr Pulls Him Back In


"Bill Barr answered questions from senators Wednesday that confirmed once and for all that rather than conducting himself as the attorney general of the United States, Barr’s title should be attorney specific since he serves a single client—Donald J. Trump.

Barr sounded something like a defendant himself, talking in circles in a display one Democrat grudgingly praised as “masterful hairsplitting” to explain how he managed to publicly exonerate his client before releasing a report that painstakingly detailed his potential crimes".

http://www.thedailybeast.com/just-when-trump-thought-he-was-out-william-barr-pulls-him-back-in

By his own admission, Barr has said he hasn't read the full report. The man has had over a month, and it's "his baby", as he characterized it. So why has he not read the entire thing? And on what basis did he draw the conclusions within his 4-page memo days following the report's release to him? He is supposed to work for "WE THE PEOPLE". Not just Trump.

If I turned on to watch the hearing and didn't know who Barr was, you would think he was Trump's attorney.

Establishing that Trump continually violates both the foreign and domestic clauses would put enormous pressure on both parties to impeach Trump, and force Republicans senators to finally choose between Trump and upholding their oaths of office.

Dems threaten Barr anew with contempt over Mueller report

"WASHINGTON (AP) — The House Judiciary Committee threatened Friday to hold Attorney General William Barr in contempt of Congress if he does not comply with a new Monday deadline for providing special counsel Robert Mueller's full, unredacted report on his Russia probe and some underlying materials".

http://www.apnews.com/48bd1b4c60bd4fa4ace1ead6e9949d37

Nadler Makes New Offer to Barr in Quest for Full Mueller Report


"House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler made a new offer Friday to Attorney General William Barr aimed at breaking a deadlock over Democratic demands to see the full, unredacted report from Special Counsel Robert Mueller.

Nadler, who issued a subpoena for the full report and the underlying materials, said that he now wants the Justice Department to allow lawmakers and certain staffers to be able to see the redacted portions of the report that don’t include grand jury material".

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-05-03/nadler-barr-mueller-report

Cohen's prison reality: A bunk bed in barrack-style hall

"The Situation" and the Fyre Festival fraudster are already there. President Donald Trump's former lawyer and fixer, Michael Cohen, is up next.

It's not reality TV. It's a federal prison 70 miles (113 kilometers) from New York City where white-collar and D-list scoundrels can do time while playing bocce ball and noshing on rugelach".

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/cohens-prison-reality-situation-shabbat-services-62796337

Don't worry, when the 'New World Order' comes, it will take away the PAIN and all will be well. Keep smiling life's good and everyone will be happy

Can Trump ride a full-throttle economy to get away from Mueller?

"Donald Trump’s reelection hinges on which side of the split-screen portrayal of his presidency voters will focus on.

On the left-hand side of the screen, one finds the Mueller report, a detailed 448-page chronicle of an administration run amok. While the special prosecutor did not find evidence that the Trump campaign conspired with the Russian government in the 2016 presidential election, he meticulously laid out the case that Trump had indeed attempted to obstruct justice. Although Mueller said he didn’t think he had the authority to bring charges against a sitting president — a view he may have to explain before the House Judiciary Committee — for those who have actually read his report, including Republican Sen. Mitt Romney, it’s difficult to come away with a lofty opinion of the man in the Oval Office. If anything, Mueller’s tome confirms the central thrust of earlier works by Michael Wolff and Bob Woodward — that Trump has no respect for the law".

http://news.yahoo.com/can-trump-ride-a-hot-economy-to-reelection-191940337.html

Did the author forget that the national debt just passed $22 trillion for the first time, after being just half that a decade ago?

Bill Barr can't be held for contempt of congress. He went willingly. He was never subpoenaed. Nice try.

The contempt charge is about subpoenad documents.

This article has a run down on what congressional powers there are (another reason I believe a POTUS needs to know the constitutional boundaries of our government branches, designed for checks and balances)


http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/05/03/contempt-congress-william-barr-democrats/3647317002/

Isn't that the offer Barr proposed several weeks ago?? An opportunity for a number of members of Congress to come to the DOJ and review the Mueller report?

House Democrat expects vote 'next week' to hold the attorney general in contempt

"WASHINGTON — A key Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee says he fully expects the panel to vote next week to hold Attorney General William Barr in contempt of Congress for failing to turn over a full, unredacted copy of special counsel Robert Mueller’s report".

http://news.yahoo.com/house-democrat-expects-vote-next-week-to-hold-attorney-general-in-contempt-235824910.html

John Yoo warns of a coming 'constitutional clash' between the president and Congress

"Former Deputy Assistant Attorney General John Yoo says President Trump is going to be unwilling to make any witnesses available to Congress for hearings related to the Mueller investigation".

http://video.foxnews.com/v/6032298663001/?playlist_id=2114913880001#sp=show-clips

Kamala Harris Fires Back At Trump For Calling Her 'Nasty'


"We have a president of the United States whose primary interest I think that has been clear as a result of what we know as a result of the Mueller report, his primary interest has been to obstruct justice,” Harris said. “My primary interest is to pursue justice. You can call that whatever name you want, but I think that’s what the American people want in a leader".

http://news.yahoo.com/kamala-harris-donald-trump-nasty-121615292.html