Your speculation that I consider persons and women as two mutually exclusive terms was a childish hasty conclusion. Adding to the sorrow, you declared your incorrect speculation to be A FACT.
Okay. No worrys?
Been on here long enough that I see examples of such mindset and was only trying to call you out.
Frankly, I'm sick of it.
Let’s assume that person P and woman W are normal people like me, and the human A is a true ascetic.
Yet...you do it again?
Here, let me give you and example:
Let’s assume that PERSON A and PERSON B are normal people like me, and the HUMAN A is a true ascetic.
Says the same thing but without the distinction of characterization.
The FACT that you distinguish PERSON A and WOMAN B is a predilection of gender bias.
Its the very fact that you classify person, woman and human as separate entities that shows bias.
If you are trying to distinguish differences between a select few and the rest of the human race, there are many ways that can be expressed that do not make women feel they are being singled out.
However, if you have the predisposition that women are somehow not part of the human race, that they need to be considered separately, it does explain your need to identify that group separately.
This indicates a predilection to male/female dominance roles in relationships.
Which tells any female that might be interested in you that you might expect her to submit to your will.
If that is what you intend, you did well.