Otherwise ... Unsubstantiated rumour is the basis of misinformation . I will add you to that list
Hey why are not whistleblower working independent a reliable source?
This whistle blower are working in WHO and i havelinked to that source before but that was ignored. Whistle blower Astrid Stuckelberger, Ph.D., a WHO insider, about what she discovered about Bill Gates and GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance.
Stuckelberger has served as deputy director of the Swiss national program of aging since the 1990s, and is the president of the WHO-funded Geneva International Network on Ageing. (Bio here https://www.astridstuckelberger.com/bio/)
see this link:
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/03/19/gavi-bill-gates-world-health-organization.aspx
Some other linked Gavi as source do they not have conflict of interests?
Independent researcher are more reliable in my book have respect for Mercola also.
If it safe why do the pharmacy company they want/have indemnity?
As posted in earlier post it is a emergency approval for the Vaccine in at least USA. Do you have any long terms studies on good working on MRNA-vaccines?
Several independent researcher have said it has backfired before in animal studies.
hello Calle

I didn’t notice your earlier post about whistleblowing and the WHO. My comment about unsubstantiated rumour was concerning a different matter . If there is any basis to the claims I am sure they will be held accountable.
As for indemnity insurance .. as far as I know most health providers have such insurance .. it provides personal protection and covers legal costs for claims relating to professional practice . I am sure lots of industries are covered by indemnity insurance .
I read recently that Pfizer consider they have enough safety data to apply for full approval . Watch this space .
It is unlikely there are long term studies available yet . Perhaps ask in a year

that said mRNA as a potential therapeutic platform has been studied since the 1990’s... the following link explains that history in more detail ...
http://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/why-are-mrna-vaccines-so-exciting-2020121021599
As you can see from the article there were several obstacles with earlier trials and research including the development of a safe delivery technique to deliver RNA to target cells . (Recent breakthroughs leading to the development of the covid vaccine have solved those obstacles and found a safe way to encapsulate and deliver the RNA so that it is not broken down.
Much of the earlier research focused on cancer cells but there have been studies which attempted to harness mRNA technology for vaccination purposes (Zika virus , Ebola , influenza ) . I haven’t reviewed those studies personally but It would be difficult to draw any comparisons /conclusions unless the exact same platform production techniques/ingredients and encapsulation method is used . . That would be like trying to compare apples and bananas .
I am not aware of other animal studies using the exact same platform (apart from the Pfizer and Moderna studies ) . Can you tell me which animal studies you are referring to ?
Well regarding Who/Gates wistle blower, i really hope they get a fair trail for Gates. If Gates can infiltrate WHO and change the definition of Pandemic and then sell Vaccines with profit something is wrong. I think it is wrong that any person should have such power. It should be transparency also, not indemnity.
I try to investigate self. Ignorance and naivety are dangerous and there are warnings now and in history for example JFK infamous speech about hidden powers with dark agendas that works partly with infiltration: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FnkdfFAqsHA .
What other branches have indemnity? Sadly politicians in Sweden have fixed that for some reasons, but else I don't know any.
Warranty are standard 1-2 year and must consults have insurances (I have one my self) if they do something wrong at least so in Sweden.
I don´t find it exiting trying a new technology on Billions without long terms studies. Then you give pharmacy company indemnity and let them into a race for selling vaccines and get money... What can go wrong...
How can one claim it safe if no long term studies?
https://anthonycolpo.com/yet-more-proof-the-covid-19-vaccines-have-not-been-thoroughly-tested-nor-proven-safe-and-effective/
Dr. Lee Merritt earlier linked bitchute-clip said it backfired. Already linked to one Kennedy here is nephew Robert Kennedy junior talking about it backfiring https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuMbRBTZhCY
If you have way to search. Then search on cat and ferrets studies and corona/ MRNA vaccine, but heard even more doctors say the same. Here is an article talking about poor studies with more links https://anthonycolpo.com/the-disturbing-truth-about-moderna-and-its-mrna-covid-19-vaccine-part-1/
This new article in Sweden suggest that the immune system have not responded as it should, might be the canaries in the mine...https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=sv&tl=en&u=https://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/a/kRVALk/forskare-skyhoga-nivaer-av-antikroppar-mot-blodplattar-hos-patiente?fbclid%3DIwAR1hLLOJxazvbbevn8r1eZ69BpgKZ-HWSynSeQktmIWNGeSxCJaH3JDDDo0
Yet, again I hope they/I are wrong, but I think this is a very risky approach.