Telecommunication and Networking Project has just Begun on Moon . The Final Phase of handing over of the project is May 2026. I am Pretty Sure the Main Contractors are doing their best to complete the Work within the Time Frame without delay Once the project is Completed I'll be moving Towards Moon to Settle down there
???
This has nothing to do with living on the Moon.
Interplanetary Internet
01 Aug 2005
http://spectrum.ieee.org/telecom/internet/the-interplanetary-internet
InterPlanetary Networking Special Interest Group (IPNSIG)
http://ipnsig.org/
LIVING on the Moon
http://www.universetoday.com/96208/the-moon-is-toxic/
An international team of researchers has attempted to quantify the health dangers of the Moon — or at least its dust-filled regolith. In a paper titled “Toxicity of Lunar Dust” (D. Linnarsson et al.) the health hazards of the Moon’s fine, powdery dust — which plagued Apollo astronauts both in and out of their suits — are investigated in detail (or as best as they can be without actually being on the Moon with the ability to collect pristine samples.)
Within their research the team, which included physiologists, pharmacologists, radiologists and toxicologists from 5 countries, investigated some of the following potential health hazards of lunar dust:
http://www.nasa.gov/hrp/bodyinspace
“RIDGE,” short for Space Radiation, Isolation and Confinement, Distance from Earth, Gravity fields, and Hostile/Closed Environments.
A paper by Robert H. Lewis
Human Safety in the Lunar Environment
http://space.nss.org/settlement/nasa/spaceresvol4/human.html
The Moon's surface is exposed to three types of hazardous ionizing radiation. The first two, the solar wind and solar flares, are produced by the Sun. The third type has its origin outside the solar system and is known as galactic cosmic rays.
The Moon is less dense than the Earth and considerably smaller. Its density indicates that the Moon's bulk composition is also somewhat different from Earth's, although it is still a terrestrial (rocky) body. The Moon's surface gravity is only one-sixth the Earth's. And, with its consequently lower escape velocity, the Moon cannot maintain a significant atmosphere. Thus, the surface is directly exposed to the vacuum of space. Lacking an atmospheric buffer, the Moon has a surface temperature that varies over several hundred degrees Celsius during the course of a lunar day/night cycle. A complete lunar day, one full rotation about its axis, requires approximately 27-1/3 terrestrial days.
Compared to the Earth, the Moon is geologically inactive. VoIcanism and internally generated seismic activity are almost nonexistent. Furthermore, water and atmospheric processes are unknown on the Moon. Other than igneous differentiation, which occurred early in lunar history, the main geological process that has acted on the Moon is impact cratering.
it should be pointed out that some lunar regoliths contain a naturally radioactive component material known as KREEP. KREEP, probably a product of volcanism, contains radioactive potassium, uranium, and thorium. Material containing a high concentration of KREEP should not be used for shielding
Moon suits have several disadvantages, one problem being their limited duty cycle. Consumables, recycling systems, and operator fatigue are the most obvious limitations to how long a "moon walk" can last.
While most 'searched' references to living on the Moon are optimistic the few 'reality check' resources pose real world obstacles which will prevent any fast colonization by life quickly trying to escape a global catastrophy on Earth.
We (humans) have most of the 'technology' which would be needed but we don't possess the means to relocate massive numbers of people to the Moon to live for an extended period of time nor the means to support them once they arrive.
People in general, think terraforming Mars is possible in a few decades but terraforming takes far longer and is likely to fail more often than succeed.
The biosphere is complex and still has many factors unknown to us.
Even Earth-based biodome projects have a low success rate. Plus you have the 'human factor' which throws a variable into the mix even if the mechanical is well executed.
The embrace of the fantasy is common considering most influences are optimistic. So-called 'documentaries' which teach people false truth and push speculation unrealistically causes a false sense of reality leading to assumptions that we (the human race) are much smarter and more capeable than we really are. This assumption of the masses negatively impacts innovation and development needed to make the advancements needed to make such fantasies reality.
Much of what the public assumes is science fact is mostly science fiction.
The reality is, no matter what the global catastrophy is, geologic, extra-terrestrial or viral, we as a species are not prepared. All we can do is respond after the fact. We can't prevent them. Unknown threats are not a priority until they are in our faces and by then, it could be too late.
Edited by
Tom4Uhere
on Mon 03/08/21 11:13 AM
Earth. 
