Topic: Rejecting the Progressive Agenda
Reply
Bart's photo

Bart

Tue 11/02/21 06:35 PM

Virginia is on the brink of turning red for the first time in twelve years. IMO this is the beginning of the rejection of Biden and his liberal agenda starting with education ( don’t f with our kids). 2nd.Immigration ( paying inconvenienced illegal immigrants) don’t think so. 3rd.Economy ( gas prices up 60%, avg. groceries up 17% if you can get them.) not good. I could go on but why beat a dead horse. New Jersey could follow.
no photo

Redrider1500

Wed 11/03/21 03:12 AM


Virginia is on the brink of turning red for the first time in twelve years. IMO this is the beginning of the rejection of Biden and his liberal agenda starting with education ( don’t f with our kids). 2nd.Immigration ( paying inconvenienced illegal immigrants) don’t think so. 3rd.Economy ( gas prices up 60%, avg. groceries up 17% if you can get them.) not good. I could go on but why beat a dead horse. New Jersey could follow.
New Jersey is close. Cinerelli is up right now. McAuliffe ran off stage to pout over losing.
Take the hint, progressive dems. Your platform stinks. We don't need you in our lives. We can live without you telling us what to do. Instead of you wanting us "woke", You wake up to the fact we don't support you.
SparklingCrystal 💖💎's photo

SparklingCrystal 💖💎

Wed 11/03/21 07:27 AM

I don't really get it... The presidential chair has barely adjusted to Biden's behind, and you have to make do with him for another 3 years.
So what does it matter that a state is switching sides?

Thing is -also in my country- the majority of people chose the resp. w@nker that is now running the show.
And then many whinge later, while many couldn't be @r$ed to vote.
Over here it's even richer as government is doing stuff that is against the law. For instance, we have a demissionary cabinet. By law they have to hold new elections. But the PM insists on serving another last term, so he doesn't do that. Which is against the law.

Seems most leaders of countries are effing up all over the place big time.
Smartazzjohn's photo

Smartazzjohn

Wed 11/03/21 08:15 AM

I'm a conservative independent.
Virginia WASN'T a land slide election.....the results were 50.7 to 48.6 in favor of Youngkin. A 2.1 percent difference isn't huge, it doesn't establish a red dominance especially when considering that almost one percent of the vote went to an independent candidate.

I see Virginia being a purple state, not red or blue.

IMO what this election proved is that Democrats CAN'T successfully call ALL Republicans the mirror image of Trump. IMO this shows Democrats can't ride the coattails of Biden (who won the state by 10%), Harris, Obama or Stacey Abrams...it seems those coattails DON'T exist. Obama proved during his presidency he couldn't pull Democrats across the finish line on his coattails........so many state candidate LOST after he campaigned heavily for them during his presidency.

New Jersey's election is more shocking than Virginia's because registered Democrat voters outnumber Republican voter by about a million and as of writing this the elections is too close to call with less than 1% separating the candidates. I don't know if New Jersey a long standing Blue stronghold is turning purple. New Jersey has been such a Democrat Party stronghold the party's heavy hitters (Biden, Harris, Obama) weren't brought in the way they were in Virginia.
cleve's photo

cleve

Wed 11/03/21 10:45 AM


the communists have been brain washing young people for 60 years in

the colleges and trying to destroy the Judeo-Christian way of life

to gain control of the us and other countries...and the liberals

have joined them so they can keep control...follow the money.....
Bart's photo

Bart

Thu 11/04/21 02:48 PM


I don't really get it... The presidential chair has barely adjusted to Biden's behind, and you have to make do with him for another 3 years.
So what does it matter that a state is switching sides?

Thing is -also in my country- the majority of people chose the resp. w@nker that is now running the show.
And then many whinge later, while many couldn't be @r$ed to vote.
Over here it's even richer as government is doing stuff that is against the law. For instance, we have a demissionary cabinet. By law they have to hold new elections. But the PM insists on serving another last term, so he doesn't do that. Which is against the law.

Seems most leaders of countries are effing up all over the place big time.
the Virginia Governors race may not seem like much for anyone that doesn’t live there. But in terms of optics it may be a hint of the way other elections may lean in the near future. Virigina is very liberal favored in the northeast and around the coast. But those areas lost ground to the liberal vote. You can also look at it like a rejection to biden agenda, especially if you add New Jersey to the quotient. New Jersey is very lopsided leaning toward the Democrat.the democrat incumbent Governor won by about 1 % point.
Bart's photo

Bart

Fri 11/05/21 06:15 AM

Just another reason to Reject Joe and all he stands for. After a couple of days of a rumor circulating thru the media about his administration is going to pay illegal immigrants that were arrested after breaking our immigration laws and separated from their children $450,000.00 each. ( I’ll be interested to see if those immigrants will be listed as someone to pay their fair share of taxes) Joe is finally asked about this plan and he acted like he knew nothing about it, Say it was a garbage report and it’s not happening two days later Joe’s spokesperson said he was alright with paying these immigrants. Is Joe lying to millions of Americans or is he that deficient in active brain function. Whatever the case may be he just keeps on giving clear examples why he and his supporters should be Voted out ASAP.
Mortman's photo

Mortman

Wed 11/17/21 06:06 AM


Just another reason to Reject Joe and all he stands for. After a couple of days of a rumor circulating thru the media about his administration is going to pay illegal immigrants that were arrested after breaking our immigration laws and separated from their children $450,000.00 each. ( I’ll be interested to see if those immigrants will be listed as someone to pay their fair share of taxes) Joe is finally asked about this plan and he acted like he knew nothing about it, Say it was a garbage report and it’s not happening two days later Joe’s spokesperson said he was alright with paying these immigrants. Is Joe lying to millions of Americans or is he that deficient in active brain function. Whatever the case may be he just keeps on giving clear examples why he and his supporters should be Voted out ASAP.


They didn't break immigration law. Seeking asylum is not against the law. Deliberately separating children from parents could be a crime in most cases, especially when the purpose was to "teach them a lesson."
Mr Good Guy's photo

Mr Good Guy

Wed 11/17/21 07:55 AM



Just another reason to Reject Joe and all he stands for. After a couple of days of a rumor circulating thru the media about his administration is going to pay illegal immigrants that were arrested after breaking our immigration laws and separated from their children $450,000.00 each. ( I’ll be interested to see if those immigrants will be listed as someone to pay their fair share of taxes) Joe is finally asked about this plan and he acted like he knew nothing about it, Say it was a garbage report and it’s not happening two days later Joe’s spokesperson said he was alright with paying these immigrants. Is Joe lying to millions of Americans or is he that deficient in active brain function. Whatever the case may be he just keeps on giving clear examples why he and his supporters should be Voted out ASAP.


They didn't break immigration law. Seeking asylum is not against the law. Deliberately separating children from parents could be a crime in most cases, especially when the purpose was to "teach them a lesson."
Oh Please! "Seeking Asylum". How naive are you? If they were fleeing for their lives, etc. they would flee to the closest safe country and thank their lucky stars they are safe. They are not doing that, they are traveling thousands of miles and for weeks and months to get to the USA. Unbelievable you believe these are asylum seekers!
Smartazzjohn's photo

Smartazzjohn

Wed 11/17/21 10:19 AM




Just another reason to Reject Joe and all he stands for. After a couple of days of a rumor circulating thru the media about his administration is going to pay illegal immigrants that were arrested after breaking our immigration laws and separated from their children $450,000.00 each. ( I’ll be interested to see if those immigrants will be listed as someone to pay their fair share of taxes) Joe is finally asked about this plan and he acted like he knew nothing about it, Say it was a garbage report and it’s not happening two days later Joe’s spokesperson said he was alright with paying these immigrants. Is Joe lying to millions of Americans or is he that deficient in active brain function. Whatever the case may be he just keeps on giving clear examples why he and his supporters should be Voted out ASAP.


They didn't break immigration law. Seeking asylum is not against the law. Deliberately separating children from parents could be a crime in most cases, especially when the purpose was to "teach them a lesson."
Oh Please! "Seeking Asylum". How naive are you? If they were fleeing for their lives, etc. they would flee to the closest safe country and thank their lucky stars they are safe. They are not doing that, they are traveling thousands of miles and for weeks and months to get to the USA. Unbelievable you believe these are asylum seekers!


You are exactly right but the left has been changing definitions to justify foreign nationals (they aren't immigrants) breaking immigration laws. As the member of a family that ACTUALLY immigrated to the US it's an insult that these people entering the country ILLEGALLY are treated BETTER than people who wait in line and enter the country LEGALLY!!!!!
Mr Good Guy's photo

Mr Good Guy

Wed 11/17/21 10:28 AM





Just another reason to Reject Joe and all he stands for. After a couple of days of a rumor circulating thru the media about his administration is going to pay illegal immigrants that were arrested after breaking our immigration laws and separated from their children $450,000.00 each. ( I’ll be interested to see if those immigrants will be listed as someone to pay their fair share of taxes) Joe is finally asked about this plan and he acted like he knew nothing about it, Say it was a garbage report and it’s not happening two days later Joe’s spokesperson said he was alright with paying these immigrants. Is Joe lying to millions of Americans or is he that deficient in active brain function. Whatever the case may be he just keeps on giving clear examples why he and his supporters should be Voted out ASAP.


They didn't break immigration law. Seeking asylum is not against the law. Deliberately separating children from parents could be a crime in most cases, especially when the purpose was to "teach them a lesson."
Oh Please! "Seeking Asylum". How naive are you? If they were fleeing for their lives, etc. they would flee to the closest safe country and thank their lucky stars they are safe. They are not doing that, they are traveling thousands of miles and for weeks and months to get to the USA. Unbelievable you believe these are asylum seekers!


You are exactly right but the left has been changing definitions to justify foreign nationals (they aren't immigrants) breaking immigration laws. As the member of a family that ACTUALLY immigrated to the US it's an insult that these people entering the country ILLEGALLY are treated BETTER than people who wait in line and enter the country LEGALLY!!!!!

Right on John. And it goes even further in that they (Illegals) are being treated even better than those BORN in the USA. Legal US residents being subjected to Covid restrictions whereas illegals being released without any concern, shots, or restrictions. This is an upside down world we are living in these days for sure!
Mortman's photo

Mortman

Wed 11/17/21 03:22 PM



They didn't break immigration law. Seeking asylum is not against the law. Deliberately separating children from parents could be a crime in most cases, especially when the purpose was to "teach them a lesson."
Oh Please! "Seeking Asylum". How naive are you? If they were fleeing for their lives, etc. they would flee to the closest safe country and thank their lucky stars they are safe. They are not doing that, they are traveling thousands of miles and for weeks and months to get to the USA. Unbelievable you believe these are asylum seekers!


You are exactly right but the left has been changing definitions to justify foreign nationals (they aren't immigrants) breaking immigration laws. As the member of a family that ACTUALLY immigrated to the US it's an insult that these people entering the country ILLEGALLY are treated BETTER than people who wait in line and enter the country LEGALLY!!!!!


The law doesn't specify how many countries they must try before applying for asylum in the US. They'll all get their hearings, according to law and due process. Most of them fail the asylum test and get deported. That's why deportations actually went UP during the Obama Administration. What makes them "asylum seekers" is not my belief, but their requests for asylum--as according to the law. Either way, it doesn't guarantee their admittance.

Also, what makes you think all those countries in-between theirs and the US are safe? Immigrants coming from Mexico report kidnappings and rape throughout their journeys. Hell, people in Cancun are currently threatened by drug cartels, and you think they're safe?! Who's being Naïve?